tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-63048122033441718312024-03-17T20:03:14.090-07:00"The Oil Bomb Maker"Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comBlogger1112125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-34562245735041816002024-03-09T00:04:00.000-08:002024-03-14T12:20:50.723-07:00 When serving food and promoting culture as an act of solidarity amid fear<p style="text-align: center;"><b></b></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b><b> When serving food and promoting culture </b></b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b><b>as an act of solidarity amid fear</b></b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b><b><br /></b></b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">(or: Thoughts after eating at Cafe Habib)<br /><br /><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNBDOqkdosZ6xw73keZEP4tz_yxhsUCOxv9okB5LJMk0wMaq148_uE3p8W4qfWkgQgahlK_2iHbpix_9epuItguOomzt4vMeAv-pG5zHk50Qfiqk23BZOfaJWM0iwiSrqTjhCIrY7hbWEjQujkZ6Ezkq796N-8vojLIsCPqN_KOKWcrwA1_qpsAj3CA-4/s1440/ED08DFD7-5FFA-4E84-A14C-D8172FD7FCAB.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1440" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNBDOqkdosZ6xw73keZEP4tz_yxhsUCOxv9okB5LJMk0wMaq148_uE3p8W4qfWkgQgahlK_2iHbpix_9epuItguOomzt4vMeAv-pG5zHk50Qfiqk23BZOfaJWM0iwiSrqTjhCIrY7hbWEjQujkZ6Ezkq796N-8vojLIsCPqN_KOKWcrwA1_qpsAj3CA-4/s320/ED08DFD7-5FFA-4E84-A14C-D8172FD7FCAB.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p style="text-align: justify;">In early 2023, Mahmoud and Nadia Habib opened their cafe in Manila to bring a piece of Palestine to the Philippines. With foods ranging from simple Pita Bread and Hummus to Chicken Biryani, Shahwarma, and the Palestinian sweet Knafeh, that establishment on Mabini Street became a "Darling" for those who expressed solidarity, particularly during a time of national struggle.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">At first glance, Cafe Habib appears to be a light, warm, and informal establishment that displays maps, photos, and symbols of Palestinian heritage. Mahmoud, a native of Gaza, and his Filipino-Iraqi wife wanted Cafe Habib to feel like Filipinos were experiencing Palestinian hospitality and to highlight Arab culture.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMkG29wLiz3jxI0RD8SPK52Hu0woEt-857FP3RM8bS3651TbVn4JmvFPPD92fKm8mwY-j2DWMXxm_Dj_y4lw1vc5Dq-p1tiAQefHEeLwglEWssV4r4LqjuQ-CJrmfTdi6oiQQXYOj7FJFFqQjpQf5N4r1mD69Y3JCjbizYrDAfIOjebD1DmhNplV6t0gM/s1440/FF97BA86-8A96-4237-B17D-2E8BA408EA27.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1084" data-original-width="1440" height="241" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMkG29wLiz3jxI0RD8SPK52Hu0woEt-857FP3RM8bS3651TbVn4JmvFPPD92fKm8mwY-j2DWMXxm_Dj_y4lw1vc5Dq-p1tiAQefHEeLwglEWssV4r4LqjuQ-CJrmfTdi6oiQQXYOj7FJFFqQjpQf5N4r1mD69Y3JCjbizYrDAfIOjebD1DmhNplV6t0gM/s320/FF97BA86-8A96-4237-B17D-2E8BA408EA27.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div><p style="text-align: justify;">And this writer, who happened to visit the cafe a few days ago, found the Chicken Biryani and Falafel to be quite good, reminding him of college days eating Middle Eastern food for lunch, as well as meeting Arabs who find yours truly "authentic" in expressing solidarity with Palestine and its people. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">To be honest, most people may still cling to the narrow-minded thought of most Arabs as warmongers, that there's no "Palestine" but rather "Israel" in its place; all due to what the media (even the internet) presents to them; but, for those who truly concerned, especially those who yearned for peace knows why resistance became necessary for the Palestinians as they themselves expelled from their homes, farms, and communities, and be dismissed as "terrorists" and thus susceptible for destruction. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">And according to Mahmoud in an interview from "Arab News" that the last time they visited was in September, just two weeks before Israel launched its latest deadly onslaught that has since killed at least 30,000 people, wounded tens of thousands more, and displaced about 1.5 million. Saddening isn't it? The civilians who wished for their right for peaceful coexistence with its neighbours be "punished" by those claiming to be superior. Thus no wonder why yours truly would say that the concrete border wall wails aloud than the wailing wall itself in Jerusalem. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">On the other hand, there are those who simply apathetic on the situation in the Middle East, maybe because they got used to limit Middle East to that of getting a job in Saudi Arabia or in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, but one Arab whom yours truly interviewed said that Iraq before the US intervention was way developed than Saudi Arabia; and Syria under Assad served as a sentinel against terrorism brought by the "islamic state". "If not for Assad, Syria and the Middle East is occupied by ISIS" he said. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Pardon if the visit may sound political - for the act of fraternising with Palestinians is itself political, what more seeing them serving their food and enjoying it is also political! Why is it anyway? A simple serving of Falafel with Garlic sauce is itself showing people a glimpse what more the taste of Palestine, and who the Palestinian people are, that is, different from what the media shows as rabblerousers and "terrorists". </p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-9558240346162362602024-03-06T09:31:00.000-08:002024-03-08T09:56:22.933-08:00Women and the Toiling Masses: Rise up amid crisis and onerous policies<div style="text-align: center;"><b>Women and the Toiling Masses: Rise up amid crisis and onerous policies</b></div><p style="text-align: center;">A Women's Day message <br />by Kat Ulrike</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">This note wishes all working women in the nation and around the world a very happy International Working Women's Day. Let this note honor the accomplishments and remember the bravery of working women who defied socially enforced gender norms and assumed roles alongside the toiling masses in the fight for equality, national liberation, and social justice. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Given the rapidly deteriorating situation, which is marked by a precipitous decline in living standards, it is critical that women join forces with the labouring masses to protect welfare and interests, promote gender equality, and oppose policies that exacerbate oppression. The situation still affects women today, just as it did under previous regimes, exacerbating their experience with unemployment, unequal pay, and unfavourable work conditions.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The current US-Marcos regime, like its predecessor, relies on big business, despotic landlords, the military, and corrupt bureaucrats to enact onerous policies. One such policy is the recent charter change, which includes a "all out" economic liberalisation programme designed to attract new foreign investment at the expense of working people, including women. This venture, like all other attempts to denationalise the economy, is motivated by the belief that the world market, not the people, should dictate the national economy, and thus the country should be opened to the whims of profiteers with promises of "investments" in exchange for fewer regulations, particularly those governing labour, the community, and the environment. This line implied further exploitation of the Filipina as a worker, as the rising cost of living, exacerbated by profiteering and rising taxes, took away her earnings.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Contractualisation, with longer and more burdensome working days, and unjust conditions in the workplaces, brought dangers while gradually removing state protections. The exploiting capitalist, in collusion with the corrupt bureaucrat, demands higher profits, trampling every woman as a worker in order to compete in the market while pretending to be "for the people" or "for the Filipina" with empty rhetorics; worse, the order's attack dogs enforce the "law" through warrantless arrests and detention, or extrajudicial means such as involuntary disappearances.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">With this situation, one could argue that the exploitation, injustice, and terror brought about by the current order have caused the Filipina to rise up and fight for national and social justice, equality, and to inspire many others to assert their rights as they have in the past. Despite its contributions, this struggle has evolved into more than just a debate about gender relations or how society should perceive women. This occasion is more than just a celebration of accomplishments, with women frequently receiving flowers and gifts, but also a reminder that women, who once held half of the sky, are also colleagues and comrades in the forefront of national and social struggle. </p><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-90782530270159345732024-02-26T01:01:00.000-08:002024-03-08T09:56:45.488-08:00When her "health-conscious" post creates negative feedbacks<div style="text-align: center;"><b>When her "health-conscious" post creates negative feedbacks</b></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">In a society where perfection becomes the standard, the pursuit of beauty frequently takes us down less-examined roads with less thought given to their ramifications. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Following the viral photo of a drip session inside Senator Robinhood Padilla's Senate office, Mariel Rodriguez-Padilla found herself at the focus of a contentious discussion. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> The controversial photo illuminates a larger conversation about the extent people will go to achieve beauty, the risks involved, and the laws governing such treatments. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Understandably, Mariel Rodriguez-Padilla's post about having an intravenous treatment (IV) drip session inside her husband's office, has sparked concern to the public. The now-deleted post demonstrates that Mrs. Padilla's IV session is motivated by vanity rather than "promoting good looks and good health" as her husband claims, and is viewed by many as "disrespectful" and a "mockery" of the upper house. This comes from the fact that it happened inside the office of a public servant. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Moreover, despite the senator's attempts to downplay the controversy or assert that his wife had no intention of disrespect, that bothersome Instagram post raises questions about the use of intravenous fluids as it raises ethical, moral, and institutional concerns in addition to safety and health-related issues. Lawyer Chel Diokno and several dermatologists have voiced alarms over the potential health risks associated with gluta drips. These risks include toxic impacts on vital organs, skin diseases, and the threat of severe infections. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> The Food and Drug Administration of the Philippines also previously warned against the use of injectable skin lightening agents, emphasizing that the distribution of unregistered health products is illegal and dangerous. No wonder Mrs. Padilla suddenly spoke out that she's taking a Vitamin C drip to dispel criticism, with her husband further noting that his wife's intention "was just to inspire others that wherever they are, they can still prioritize their health by taking vitamins.” </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> But again, Mrs. Padilla's post did cause serious worry since it promotes something that is prohibited and illegal according to the Department of Health (DoH). It raises important questions about the appropriateness of conducting such procedures in unauthorized settings, such as a Senate office. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Sen. Binay was right when she said that being famous had drawbacks, particularly when Mrs. Padilla's spouse is a senator. Furthermore, the senator should be reminded that great power comes great responsibility, public service is a public trust, and that, in his capacity as a legislator, he bears the additional obligation of upholding the institution's integrity as a public servant. </span></div><div><br /></div><div> Otherwise, why is he there? Is he truly serving the public or is he just trying to impress just like his wife?</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-79007455359523043642024-02-25T19:44:00.000-08:002024-03-08T11:55:49.964-08:00"When changing the tune doesn't stop the irritating music" <div style="text-align: center;"><b>"When changing the tune doesn't stop the irritating music"</b> </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> After making strong remarks about President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in late January, former President Rodrigo Duterte moderated his hostile tone during a "prayer rally" at South Road Properties in Cebu City on Sunday, February 25. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> From using terms like "drug addict" to that of opposing Marcos's plan for charter change, the former president, known for making contradictory statements and sarcasm, end calling Marcos as a "dignified man" and saying he had nothing against the Marcos administration’s charter change efforts, provided they didn’t serve to advantage the current President. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> However, these changing tunes doesn't soften the stances of his supporters towards the current regime if not trying to salvage that goddamned "unity" betwen the Marcos and Duterte factions- especially knowing how the current regime indicate increasing support for the drug war investigation despite undecided on cooperating with the International Criminal Court (ICC). </div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Ironically, that "prayer rally" Duterte led ain't even a prayer rally but an effort to rally support towards him in a time he's in danger of getting arrested. Prayers? For sure people remember how that former president called God "Stupid" and lambasted the Pope for the traffic, what more of seeing Willie Revillame's dancers on stage dancing during that "prayer rally". Besides, why instead of prayers would be that of rants? </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Perhaps this note doesn't find any basis to see both factions in need of "unity", Imee Marcos and others within the administration may've tried best to maintain that "unity" despite the obvious dissolution due to major differences. Not surprising if these two factions through its online influencers willing to hurl mud at each other just to defend their idols and its controversial policies; Otherwise, both Marcos and Duterte sworn to upheld the status quo that's already tainted, what more soiled by entrenched interests- and in the face of growing opposition due to the corruption, injustice, and oppression that's condoned and tolerated by these two. </div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> To cut the thought short, Duterte's change of tune doesn't stop the irritating music people wanted to stop. Those who once snared by Duterte's tirades are nothing but empty rhetorics as they saw the obvious soiled facts justified with terms such as peace and order. He may find Mindanao separatism, charter change, or Marcos's alleged drug abuse as empty words to babble with, but these cannot save an already crumbling structure called "unity". It also makes no sense in changing the tune as the concerned find his view shallow and pretentious from the start, by claiming himself to be patriotic as that of the patriots yet the same Duterte who kowtows with the Chinese; what more cries separatism after getting troubled by the refusal of the Marcos regime to block the ICC from proceeding with its case against him and his cohorts for crimes against humanity. </div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> But for the concerned this pretentious bullshitry needs to stop as they want to take back the future from the unjust and the corrupt. As patriots the need to expose and oppose the crackpots and gangsters in the bureaucracy becomes imminent with words like "Bombard the Headquarters" starting to churn in everyone's minds. </div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-1326070516015530612024-02-25T11:38:00.000-08:002024-02-26T08:03:50.802-08:00The beginning and end of Beijing's "Forbidden City" reconstruction plans<div style="text-align: center;"><b>The beginning and end of Beijing's </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>"Forbidden City" reconstruction plans</b></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Wang Jun </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> On October 14, 2005, Zheng Xin, Vice Minister of the Ministry of Culture and President of the Palace Museum, published an article "Looking Back, Inspection and Prospect - Written on the 80th Anniversary of the Founding of the Palace Museum" in Guangming Daily, disclosed: "In the early 1960s, someone proposed that the Forbidden City was vast and sparsely populated. It's backward construction, it should be right.
It was transformed; in the early stage of the Cultural Revolution, there was also an absurd and terrible 'rectification plan' in the Forbidden City. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"> For these little-known historical facts, the article has not been elaborated, but it is already surprising: how did such a thing happen?</span></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">A confusing nightmare </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div><div style="text-align: justify;">Zheng Xi's book "Eighty Years of the Palace Museum" was released in October 2005. It mentions other topics covered in an article of the same name. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">"Build an east-west road inside the Forbidden City and transform the Wenhua Hall and Wuying Hall into entertainment places" was the renovation concept that was put forth in the early 1960s. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">The "rectification plan" for the "Cultural Revolution" calls for "erecting two large placards in front of the Taihe Hall, one east and one west, the Taihe Hall, which is more than 18 meters high in ancient height, and using it to overwhelm the 'king spirit'; the Taihe Hall's throne should be moved down and sealed; the statue of a farmer with guns should be shaped on the throne, with the muzzle aimed at the overthrown emperor." The emperor's temporary resting spot, which was neutral and served as a place of repose before to the Taihe Hall ceremony, was transformed into a "people's lounge." Additionally, all the palaces and doorways that symbolized feudal consciousness were destroyed. The 'People's Lounge' has been set up, the projects in these plans have been completed, and the rest have been overlooked since they are too busy to handle them. </div></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> He analyzed: <i>"The architecture of the Forbidden City is magnificent and magnificent, and most of the Forbidden City is a treasure, so the Palace Museum was established. But the Forbidden City is also a feudal palace. In the minds of many revolutionaries who oppose the overthrow of the imperial system by feudalism, there is always a shadow that lingers: is it right to value the Forbidden City so much? Is the protection of the Forbidden City consistent with the anti-feudal purpose? </i></div><div><br /></div><div><div style="text-align: justify;">Jing Hengyi, a member of the National Government, proposed in 1928 to "abolish the Palace Museum and auction or remove all items of the Palace respectively," claiming that the museum was engaged in "the study of how to equip the palace and the things used by the emperor." The palace is only Tianzi's first reverse production. "Isn't it preparing to be the emperor in the future and set up a preparatory office for the ceremony in advance?" one may ask. It is appropriate to auction reverse production. Hengyi's suggestion sparked a contentious debate before the National Government sent a letter requesting reconsideration to the Central Political Conference. Ultimately, the plan was rejected. </div></div><div><br /></div><div><div style="text-align: justify;">"Yet Jing's perspective has not vanished." Since the People's Republic of China was established, this line of thinking has never stopped and is frequently articulated in a variety of ways. Treating our history and traditions with respect remains its fundamental aspect. Though the state values the Palace Museum highly, many people are still astounded by the relationship that exists between the palace, the emperor, and the "feudal" class.</div></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">"The Forbidden City will start to be rebuilt" </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div><div style="text-align: justify;"> In September 1958, the Beijing Master Plan (Draft) stated: "The Forbidden City will start to be rebuilt." </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The "Planning Instructions" specifically proposes: "Organize Tiananmen Square, the Forbidden City, Zhongshan Park, Cultural Palace, Jingshan, Beihai, Shichahai, Jishuitan, Qiansanmen moat and other places, demolish some houses, expand the green area, and make it a large garden in the city center, and enjoy the joy of millions of people at the festival. The place. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1959, the Beijing Municipal Urban Construction Commission proposed that "Tiananmen Square and some buildings in the Forbidden City" could be protected, and "the Forbidden City should be transformed into a mass cultural and rest place". </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Previously, Mao Zedong delivered a speech at the Nanning Conference and the Supreme State Council in January 1958: "I feel uncomfortable with the houses in Beijing and Kaifeng." "The walls of Nanjing, Jinan and Changsha have been demolished very well, and the old houses in Beijing and Kaifeng should all be turned into new houses." </div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Mao said this when he mentioned Zhang Xiruo twice. On May 1, 1957, Mao solicited the opinions of Zhang Xiruo, a political scientist and Minister of Education, on his work. Zhang summed up his usual feelings as "good joy, quick success, contempt for the past, and superstition in the future" and put it up in person. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
"'Good joy to return', what is the great achievement, whether it is the great joy of the counter-revolution or the great joy of the revolution. It's not big, isn't it so small?" Mao said at the Nanning meeting, "China's revolution, such a big cooperative, such a big rectification, are all great achievements, and they don't like merit. Have you liked it?' Be eager for quick success and quick profit. Don't work hard. Do you want to pass? It's not good for the people. Is it harmful? Isn't it good to despise the past, despise the little feet, and despise the braids? </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Mao set the tone: "Antiques should not be bad, nor too good. Beijing demolished the archway, made a hole in the gate, and also cried. This is a political issue. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On April 14, 1958, Zhou Enlai sent a letter to the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China to convey the spirit of the executive meeting of the State Council, proposing that "according to the instructions of Chairman Mao, the urban landscape of Beijing should be completely changed in the next few years." After that, Beijing quickly formulated a plan to complete the reconstruction of the old city for about ten years, and the "Forbidden City should start reconstruction" was immediately proposed. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Tao Zongzhen, the architect of the Beijing Municipal Urban Planning Administration, recalled the speech of a leader of the bureau at that time: "He said, why can't it exceed the ancient times? Tiananmen Square can demolish and build the State Council building to give a powerful blow to the feudal and backward things!" </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
"At that time, Peng Zhen said that the Forbidden City was built for the emperor. Can it be changed into a central government office building? Have you ever thought about it? The technician drew a few strokes casually and didn't take it seriously. During the Cultural Revolution, this matter was found out. Some people said that you were going to build a palace for Liu Shaoqi. In fact, what Peng Zhen said is actually what the chairman said. Zhou Yongyuan, deputy director of the Beijing Municipal Urban Planning Administration, made such an explanation to the author before his death. </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div>When Mao Zedong climbed the palace wall for three times <div>(and did not enter the palace) <div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Zhang Xiruo, who made Mao Zedong angry, once took the People's Liberation Army cadres to ask Liang Sicheng, an architect and professor of Tsinghua University, to draw a map of Beiping cultural relics when he was forced to attack the city on December 18, 1948.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The day before this, Mao personally drafted a telegram from the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China to the General Committee of the Pingjin Campaign, demanding full attention to the protection of the Beiping Industrial Zone and cultural monuments. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">On January 16, 1949, Mao again drafted a telegram from the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China on the protection of cultural monuments in Peiping, which mentioned the Forbidden City: "This In the second siege, a precise plan must be made to avoid destroying the Forbidden City, universities and other famous and valuable cultural monuments. On January 31, 1949, Beiping was peacefully liberated, and the capital planning was launched immediately. Liang Sicheng, who participated in the planning work, disagreed with the Soviet experts invited to Beijing to guide the work. Liang Sicheng and Chen Zhanxiang, an urban planning expert, jointly proposed that the central administrative region should be built in the western area outside the ancient city in order to achieve balanced development between the old and the new. Soviet experts proposed that the central administrative region should be built in the central area of the ancient city and start the reconstruction of the ancient city. Mao supported the latter.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Ancient buildings such as city walls, towers and archways in Beijing have begun to be demolished one after another. In August 1952, the left gate of Chang'an and the right gate of Chang'an on the east and west sides of Tiananmen Square were demolished. In May 1956, the Beijing Municipal Planning Bureau and the Beijing Municipal Road Engineering Bureau repaired Zhushi Street (now East Fourth West Street and Wusi Street) to the north entrance of Beichang Street, and demolished the Xili Pavilion and archway in front of the Dagao Xuan Hall, the north doorway of the Forbidden City and The east-west houses and the increasingly fierce demolition of the ancient city finally led to Zhang Xiruo confess his opinion to Mao Zedong in 1957.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Mao Zedong had a relationship with the Forbidden City. Yi Peiji, a teacher at Hunan Provincial First Normal School in his early years, became the president of the Palace Museum in 1929. In December 1919, Mao Zedong led a delegation to Beijing to petition the expulsion of Hunan warlord Zhang Jingyao, who lived at the foot of the Forbidden City.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In April 1954, Mao Zedong climbed the wall of the Forbidden City three times in four days.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On the afternoon of April 18, 1954, Mao took a bus to Shenwumen of the Forbidden City, from Dongdeng Road to the Shenwumen Tower, along the city wall to the northeast corner tower to the south, through the Donghua Gate and the southeast corner tower, to the Meridian Gate, from the Wumen Tower to the city wall, back to Zhongnanhai.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On the afternoon of April 20, Mao took a bus to the Meridian Gate of the Forbidden City, climbed the Meridian Gate Tower, visited the exhibition of cultural relics unearthed in the historical museum there, and went down to the tower and returned to Zhongnanhai.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On the afternoon of April 21, Mao took a bus to Shenwumen of the Forbidden City. He went west along the city wall from the Shenwu Gate Tower on Xideng Road, and went through the northwest corner tower, Xihua Gate and southwest corner building to the Meridian Gate.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
After three routes, the Chairman just took a detour on the wall of the Forbidden City. This is the only record of Mao Zedong's three times to the Forbidden City, and these three times he only climbed the wall and did not enter the palace.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
How does Chairman Mao feel about walking slowly on the wall? Did he think of the plan to rebuild the Forbidden City? Why didn't he walk in the Forbidden City?</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">No one knows the inside story.
</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>
"Plan to remove dross buildings"
</div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In October 1952, the Beijing Municipal Government held a meeting to discuss the project. Liang Sicheng recorded the opinion of a speaker in his notebook: "I don't agree with the central government in Tiananmen."
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In July 1953, the Beijing Municipal Construction Department and the district committees expressed their opinions on urban planning. Most of the people advocated the demolition of the city wall, believing that the Forbidden City was enough to protect antiquities, and proposed that "the main organs of the Central Committee are distributed in the inner ring, extending the Party Central Committee and the Central People's Government to the south of Tiananmen Square, and losing the Forbidden City. Build high-rise buildings in the back and around it, forming a pressure.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1955, Liang Sicheng's architectural ideas were criticized. He Zuoxu, who was working in the Central Propaganda Department at that time, published a critical article in the magazine Learning, saying: "Why is the urban construction of the old Beijing city without even any shortcomings? For example, the city walls of Beijing have greatly hindered the traffic in the suburbs and in Beijing, so that we have to open up many gaps in the city wall. For example, there is a large Forbidden City in Beijing, so that pedestrians have to take a detour, and the traffic is very inconvenient.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The "three-year difficulties" in the "Great Leap Forward" period forced Beijing's plan to rebuild the Forbidden City in 1958 and complete the reconstruction of the old city in about a decade. However, during this period, the Palace Museum put forward a "plan to remove dross buildings" - while implementing the repair and finishing of ancient buildings step by step, it also began to plan the reconstruction project to prepare for the clean-up and demolition of some "dross" buildings in the courtyard that do not reflect the "people's nature".
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Culture put forward a request: "(1) If it can be used temporarily, it may not be demolished; (2) Select a few typical places to retain the houses and duty rooms where the palace servants (eunuches, maids, etc.) lived in the past, and mark the text description, so as to compare with the emperor's luxury life and level the audience. Level education; (3) When dismantling indoor walls, attention should be paid to the safety of buildings; (4) materials that can be used, attention should be paid to protection when demolition, and should be properly preserved and used after demolition; (5) Demolisted buildings should be taken.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The implementation of the plan is that "a number of dross buildings such as Jiangxuexuan Shed, Yangxing Zhai Shuan, Jihui Pavilion, Luqi, Jianfumen, Huifeng Pavilion, etc. will be demolished within a year."
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The reconstruction plan was brought up again.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1964, the Report on Beijing's Urban Construction mentioned the reconstruction plan of East and West Chang'an Street, and the reconstruction plan of the Forbidden City was put up again and studied. Opening up an east-west road in the Forbidden City is only one of the plans.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Wu Han, Vice Mayor of Beijing, changed the construction of the Forbidden City in his article "Talking about Beijing City":
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The historical development of Beijing City tells us that neither the city construction, the political center, the street layout, the height of the house, etc. are immutable. The opposite conclusion is that it must be changed. We must have such a historical understanding so that we can not be shrouded in the shadow of our predecessors and move forward in a healthy way.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1964, after six design units came up with a plan, Beijing held an exhibition, and the reconstruction plan of the Forbidden City was exhibited in the internal room. Several schemes are internally discussed and do not form decisions and facts. Liu Ren, the Second Secretary of the Beijing Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China, looked at the reconstruction plan of the Forbidden City and left with a smile.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
During the exhibition, Wu Han listened to the guests in the Oriole Hall in the Summer Palace, and some city leaders and planners were present. During the banquet, Wu Han talked about the Forbidden City and quoted the scriptures, saying that the Forbidden City has been changing since ancient times. Pu Yi also sawed off the threshold of the Forbidden City for cycling.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture of Tsinghua University in January 1965, the Collected Collection of Discussion on Teaching Thoughts (1) included an article entitled "Analyzing the Architectural Art of the Forbidden City and Tiananmen Square from a Class Perspective", saying that "the Forbidden City has no 'people's nature'" and "Today, the working people are the masters, and the Forbidden City is no longer feudal rule. The palace of the class has become the wealth of the people, so we also transform it and use it to serve today's socialism.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The article lists the views of the "working people" on the Forbidden City: "It's empty and loose, with a broken chair on the stage and looking at the 'greasy'! It's more tiring than marching!" What we are not interested in is just not suitable for our needs." With a stack of big wood, they can build fifty rooms. It can only build one room, and it can't stay for a few people!" It occupies such a large space, and it is still in the middle of the city." In the past, some of us were scared by the architectural style of the Forbidden City and fell at the feet of the feudal emperors, and we still haven't got up yet." Such a big country should have a good center.
</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>
"Smash the Forbidden City!"
</div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1966, the "Cultural Revolution" broke out, and the reconstruction plan of the Forbidden City was listed as the "crime evidence" that the Beijing Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China wanted to give Liu Shaoqi the palace.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In the reconstruction plan, the Forbidden City did not have peace. On May 23, 1966, the clay sculpture "rent collection house" exhibition opened in the Shenwumen Tower, and then moved to the Fengxian Hall of the Forbidden City to continue the exhibition. For this reason, from June to July 1966, the I-shaped hall of Fengxian Hall was changed to a square. The statue of Mao Zedong was hung in the Fengxian Hall. The silk furnace used for the sacrifice of ancestors in the Qing Dynasty in front of the hall was considered to be inconsistent with the content of the exhibition and was demolished.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On August 3, 1966, eleven clay statues and a pair of clay-shaped horses in the Forbidden City God Temple were destroyed. On August 16, except for the "rent collection house" exhibition, all other parts of the Forbidden City were closed and closed.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The marble door plaque of the Palace Museum is covered by paper, and the ink pen book "Blood and Tears Palace" is three words; on the brick wall outside the Shenwu Gate, "Burning the Forbidden City!!!" Smash the Forbidden City!" The big-character newspaper is posted.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
The "rectification plan" of the Forbidden City was immediately released. The forehead of the door of Shunzhen Gate, Tianyi Gate, Wenhua Hall and Qianlong Garden was removed, and the throne of Zhonghe Hall was demolished.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Other projects of the "rectification plan" have not been implemented, that is, they encountered the tide of "criticizing the bourgeois reactionary line". In May, they entered the Palace Museum and led the staff of the military propaganda team to criticize the "black line" and implement the "red line". In a blink of an eye, they became the object of criticism and struggle. In October, they had to withdraw from the Forbidden City, "the rectification party The case is over.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On May 26, 1967, Premier Zhou Enlai sent a battalion from the Beijing Garrison to the Palace Museum to implement military protection to protect the Palace and cultural relics from direct destruction.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1970, five rooms in front of the Qin'an Hall of the Forbidden City were demolished (restored in 2005).
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In July 1971, the Palace Museum reopened. The museum compiled the Introduction to the Forbidden City and printed the "Quotations of Chairman Mao": "You see, for thousands of years, the palaces of those feudal emperors were not strong? The crowd came together and fell down one by one.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On March 27, 1973, due to the need of Luoyang White Horse Temple to receive Prince Sihanouk, according to the instructions of the superiors, all the cultural relics of the Great Buddha Hall of the Cining Palace of the Forbidden City were transferred to Luoyang White Horse Temple and have not been returned so far. When carrying cultural relics, the architectural paintings of the Great Buddha Hall of Cining Palace were destroyed.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
In 1972, the East Building of the Beijing Hotel, which was designed with a height of more than 100 meters, was built on the east side of the Forbidden City. During the construction, it was found that it constituted a peep into the South China Sea, and the height of the East Building was reduced to 876 meters. On February 10, 1974, with the approval of the State Council, five obstructive buildings began construction on the north and south sides of the Xihua Gate of the Forbidden City. The following year Completed on November 22.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Previously, it was suggested that the Meridian Gate of the Forbidden City should be raised to act as a shield, which was rejected by Zhou Enlai.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Zhou Enlai proposed that the height of the old city of Beijing should not exceed 45 meters.
</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div> "Lu Dingyi rushed and angrily protected the Forbidden City!"</div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
"Lu Dingyi protected the Forbidden City and made great contributions!" Referring to the reconstruction plan of the Forbidden City that year, Xie Chensheng, a consultant of the China Society for the Protection of Cultural Relics, said.
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
Wang Yeqiu, then director of the Cultural Heritage Bureau, was notified by the meeting of the Central Propaganda Department that the topic was to discuss the reconstruction plan of the Forbidden City. Wang Yeqiu became angry as soon as he heard it and refused to attend. Xie Chensheng recalled, "Later, when he saw me, he regretted it and said that he really should attend that meeting!" I thought that the meeting held by the Central Propaganda Department had been set, but it turned out to be a meeting to protect the Forbidden City. Lu Ding gave the plan to it!"
</div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
What Lu Dingyi left out was the plan to open a road in the Forbidden City. This road is planned to cross from Xihua Gate to Donghua Gate, and the two halls of Wenhua and Wuying will be used as entertainment places. Xie Chensheng said, "The plan was proposed by Beijing. The two major reasons for reconstruction are that the Forbidden City is 'the land is vast and sparsely populated, and the feudalism is backward'."
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
At this meeting, Lu Dingyi was furious. Lu Dingyi said, </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i>"'feudal backward', the Forbidden City is feudal backwardness. If it is not feudal backward, how can it be called the Forbidden City? The land is vast and sparsely populated. What's wrong with leaving a place for the people to visit and rest? In my opinion, don't light the light bulb in the Forbidden City for 10,000 years. Our cadres above the department level of the Central Propaganda Department are all 'Royalists'!" </i></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">At that time, the opinion of two central leaders was to dismantle the Forbidden City to repair the road, but Lu Dingyi's advice made the Forbidden City safe. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
On the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the establishment of the Palace Museum, Lu De, the son of Lu Dingyi, wrote in Beijing Daily: </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i>"Regarding the protection of the Forbidden City, my father said: In the 1950s and 1960s, in order to carry out construction, Beijing needed to demolish some ancient buildings. Some experts and scholars disagree, and some have cried bitterly about it. We reported this situation to the Chairman (Mao), who said: 'These old and young people, when the subjugated slaves (Note: when Japan invaded and occupied Beijing) they did not cry, and demolished several archways, they would cry?!' No one dares to reflect this kind of thing easily in the future. It seems that in order to protect the Forbidden City, my father took a great political risk in the early 1960s."</i></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">***</div><div><br /></div><div>
(Extracted from Reading Library 0602, May 2006 edition of Tongxin Publishing House)</div></div></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-24502590121972059132024-02-24T09:43:00.000-08:002024-02-26T12:09:40.535-08:00"Neither their whine nor their reation" (Now's the time continuing the revolution)<div style="text-align: center;"><b>"Neither their whine nor their reation"</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>(Now's the time continuing the revolution)</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b><br /></b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfouNS2rGnp89e7nX_oT3CW7YxICtnDVveZIM0Um2enE5JuZEcHBWVJk7bB-CBMpbLp7dxQVckDK9rFzoZBfdcKbzMxvy4OyPT0HAYKFl34dPY9WTmreYMJdDRZ0-_6fHUJqXOoBPRb4GaGe9bnRET1Gq5cvpsbtyeXgEKhYHeceTAEYFQH0vrvBiQ54I/s300/anbscs.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="249" data-original-width="300" height="249" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfouNS2rGnp89e7nX_oT3CW7YxICtnDVveZIM0Um2enE5JuZEcHBWVJk7bB-CBMpbLp7dxQVckDK9rFzoZBfdcKbzMxvy4OyPT0HAYKFl34dPY9WTmreYMJdDRZ0-_6fHUJqXOoBPRb4GaGe9bnRET1Gq5cvpsbtyeXgEKhYHeceTAEYFQH0vrvBiQ54I/s1600/anbscs.jpg" width="300" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Old yankee money is now no longer shining </div><div style="text-align: center;">While goddamn mainlanders whose cancer is quite threat'ning</div><div style="text-align: center;">The hand of the both imperialists is not so scary </div><div style="text-align: center;"> For the dawn of the people will scare them badly </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Amidst the order, its state-led terrorism </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Resistance is rising no place for defeatism </div><div style="text-align: center;"> The Unity of people will sweep them badly </div><div style="text-align: center;"> In every front until they're gone, come join the party </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Neither their "whine" nor their reaction </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Now's the time continuing the revolution </div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Advance, fighting masses their threat is deemed no meaning</div><div style="text-align: center;">Neither law nor truncheon will beat the battle coming </div><div style="text-align: center;"> The congress nor the courts even police and army </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Together slaves of the order: to hell so badly </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Advance, fighting masses, together striking in flanks </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Despite stabbing our backs this ne'er tire our ranks </div><div style="text-align: center;"> The blade of the old tyrants now stabbing their own throats</div><div style="text-align: center;"> While their attack dogs now fleeing searching for new hosts </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Neither their "whine" nor their reaction </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Now's the time continuing the revolution </div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Amidst the hardships, betrayals and of infamies </div><div style="text-align: center;">The road to our freedom still taken and surely </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Even thousands of traitors who join in this journey </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Only the few will see the sun rising with its glory </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> We're the vanguard of the sovereign people </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Taking the weapon continuing the struggle </div><div style="text-align: center;"> The same revolt of past ages will end the error </div><div style="text-align: center;"> We will reboot society to end their terror </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Neither their "whine" nor their reaction </div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;">Now's the time continuing the revolution</span></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-15851153031323356872024-02-24T06:25:00.000-08:002024-02-24T11:25:28.266-08:00Peace, Land, Justice, Jobs, Decent Wage not "Charter Change!"<div style="text-align: center;"><b>Peace, Land, Justice, Jobs, Decent Wage </b></div><div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>not "Charter Change!"</b></div><p style="text-align: center;"> By Kat Ulrike </p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"> Instead of addressing numerous challenges of the Filipino people the current Marcos administation, in connivance with Speaker Martin Romualdez and others prioritises amending the constitution with the goal of opening and depending further the country to Foreign Direct Investment. This venture tends to downplay that of basic social problems like low wages, rising costs of commodities, slow-paced industrialisation and domestic-based development, lack of genuine agrarian reform, and pseudo-"sovereignty". </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> By pursuing this "Charter Change", the Marcos administration wanting to enact 100% Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Ownership of local businesses, domestic utilities, and national patrimony, making the national economy be at the hands of foreign profiteers in connivance with local despots and at expense of the stuggling masses. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> Contrary to the establishment's blame on the current constitution for national woes, it is not in the constution but rather in this continuing-past of subservience to entrenched interests both local and foreign. By looking back at history previous administrations been subservient to unequal agreements and enacting oppressive policies at the expense of the people, while pretending to uphold justice and democratic rights.
And contrary to these proponents, the Philippines is lenient if not lax when it comes to Foreign Direct Investment, yet far from its neighbours in South East Asia. It is not surprising if these advocates wished for unbridled, unregulated kind claiming these what the international market needed in today's societies. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> Regardless of the statements coming from the administration and its apologists, the toiling masses demand for right wages, better jobs and working standards, genuine agrarian reform, national industrialisation and domestic based development, and defending human rights and national sovereignty. The current regime may've promised and parroted such sentiment, but the neoliberal-oriented "Charter Change" being peddled as a panacea for social ills but rather consolidates interest-seekers at the expense of the toiling masses. Those being "left out after EDSA" are rather fooled by the very rotten order whose personages wanting not just "through and through" economic liberalisation but also political power through term extension while pretending promising the vulnerable with "social justice" through "Charter Change". </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> Folk! Changing the charter by the very rotten order is not reform! It is consolidation of interests! A counterreaction to an existing reaction! </p></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-43299207702831795262024-02-21T03:19:00.000-08:002024-02-21T03:19:22.781-08:00“Is that so? Everyone doesn’t think so.”<p style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center;">“Is that so? Everyone doesn’t think so.” <br><br></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The recent events that brought division between the Marcos and Duterte factions has clearly showeth that their unity becomes a farce. Be it issues regarding Marcos's alleged cocaine use to Duterte's use of Fentanyl, to that of threats of arrest from the International Criminal Court and alleged clamours for Mindanao's secession from the Philippine state, these recent events doesn't stop people from seeing them both as accomplices of maintaining a rotten, decadent social order that benefits themselves and its camarilla- all at the expense of the labouring people whom they promised a "comfortable life for all" in the "new Philippines."</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> How come this note say so? Duterte's statement is not borne out of principle but of his own fear, as news about the International Criminal Court entering the Philippines has fueled much of angst by his supporters, and further justified by the current regime's reluctance to expel investigators from further doing such actions. Duterte would churn rumours of Marcos's alleged use of Cocaine- that made Marcos churn about the former president still using Fentanyl. With these would say shows that this "Mindanao separatist" issue is not driven of principle as Duterte and his ilk claim- but of fear and of still keeping interest. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> Even the so-called amendments to the constitution caused controversy; those who had previously been "pro-charter change" turned against it, while others who had supported it pushed the agenda through "People's Initiative." This was the case even though both sides pushed for the charter change because it contained "economic amendments" that enshrined the neoliberal policies of liberalization, deregulation, and privatization and further reinforced the dominance of foreign capitalists over the country's resources and economy. Why would Duterte oppose those "economic provisions" in that "initiative" yet he and his camarilla forcefully advocated for the passing of neoliberal laws and policies? Or is it a result of the present regime's reversal of course and return to US military action against China, which the previous administration attempted to favour with? Once more, there is no principle in what Duterte and his allies are attempting to convey in their criticism of Marcos—especially considering that both are willing to sacrifice the nation's patrimony for powerful interests and are subjects of foreign tyrants. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> But as the rift continues thus exposes Duterte becoming desperate- that by babbling "Mindanao separatism" and his supporters strongly supporting him especially in the face of possible arrest by the International Criminal Court shows trying to gain leverage (and credibility) to push back against the Marcoses’ schemes to degrade their economic and political power. His "Federalism" scheme, just like the attempt for "revolutionary government" failed and still Duterte have misled Filipinos by banked his presidential campaign on federalism because he and some of his key allies are now against constitutional reforms. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> However, supporters of both camps would argue that this is irrelevant because they continue to uphold "unity" in spite of this being the clear right and in spite of recent events where both factions have wasted public funds on busing in supporters to create the appearance that they have widespread support. The deplorable conditions of the people were used by both warring groups, who seemed to be advocating for "unity" and "change" while entertaining them and promising them government assistance. Bullshit and mudslinging are being used by social media experts and vloggers to mislead readers as the rift gets worse. Sounds familiar in order to avoid acknowledging the reality, which is that the nation is still far from fulfilling people's dreams due to an order that falsely claims to speak for the Filipino people. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">In the meantime, Duterte's sockpuppets showed off the notion that his remarks—who is well-known for making absurd claims—should not be taken seriously. It was hard for journalists to cover him because of his tendency to startle people. According to the article from the Manila Times, it said: "They were used to heads of state who can be taken literally, without the need for adding context." <br><br>By flaunting such nonsense would say that the former president tries to rally Mindanaoans to his standard thinking they voted for him; but did these people voted for him simply because he's a Mindanaoan who promised change? Peace? Development? Not all would say voted because of his background nor his promises, let alone how he snared them by his antics and his "hands on" kind of politics as they would say "he relates to the common people" the way he uses expletives and sarcasm to convey his thoughts and thus becoming policies. However, he's the same Duterte who chose to swore upholding a rotten, oppressive social order. He even intensified it by making laws that put burden to the common folk for the interests of the few. And now he talks about separatism that even the Moros and most Mindanaoans beg to disagree on him in the name of "national unity". <br><br>For the concerned these bullshits doesn't water down the fact that he babble it out of fear- that his case against the folk are being investigated for his crimes and therefore he and his ilk facing arrests. Even Dela Rosa, his trusted henchman who once led the Philippine National Police chose to side with the current administration than his master, is it because of principle as a legislator supporting the administration? Or simply by fear because he's part of the Duterte camarilla? <br><br><i>“On my part, personally, right now I don’t want to because I don’t want to get a visa if I go. I will visit my grandchildren here in Batangas,” </i>dela Rosa said in an article from the Inquirer, speaking partly in Filipino, when asked if he is in favor of the “One Mindanao” proposal.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><i>"From Davao, I will fly here. I will have to get a visa because it turns out that Luzon and Visayas are already different countries."</i> Dela Rosa added. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">With these words would say that one of Duterte's henchmen rejects his boss's words, despite claiming that those who promote Mindanao separatism "were just sending a message that they would be forced to encourage a separate state if pushed to the wall"; however, dela Rosa said he would back Mindanao's secession in the "worst" case scenario as he said. But, is Duterte much so dela Rosa and those supporting the past administration really for the Mindanaoans much so as Filipinos? Or just because they're feared of being investigated further, much so arrested by the International Criminal Court for their actions? No wonder why Congressman Raoul Manuel said Duterte should not treat Mindanao as if his own realm much so an escape bunker amid investigations by the ICC. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Wouldn't be surprised if there are others who supported Duterte also changing their tones, if not end mum as interfering costs their so-called political integrity. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> Despite this, some would argue that the warring camps are still committed to upholding a corrupt social order, and that nothing has changed. Whether the legislators continue to clamour for "charter change" or Duterte with his "separatist" agenda, that the Filipino people are still forced to deal with issues like growing costs, low wages, unemployment, landlessness, economic dispossession, widespread corruption, declining social conditions, a lack of public services, and other issues brought on by the nation's vassalage to powerful foreign powers and entrenched interests. Once more, the "new Philippines" is nothing "new" other than reworded statements and programs, but the goal of upholding the status quo and uniting interests is still the same- and wouldn't be surprised if the rift between two camps continues to be aggravated. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> As said a year ago the country is still in a state of "Vivere Pericoloso" thanks to those whose interests trying to hinder the aspirations of the people whether by amending the fundamental law, churning state funds for "malicious purposes", to that of slander in social media by its supporters, or by the bullet as attack dogs in various forms trying to silence growing dissent. Yes, the folks are living dangerously despite promises of stability, whereas the past administration loves to gaslight, the current one will "kill us softly with his words".</p><p style="text-align: justify;">And since the country and its people is still living dangerously, then why not have the will to resist? For sure they have enough of tyrants and scoundrels, of incompetents and those spewing with hollow phrases. No bullet, law, nor "heaven" of theirs will stop the people's call for just aspirations. </p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-13443964052845994112024-02-10T08:32:00.000-08:002024-02-10T08:32:39.097-08:00"Chinese New Year's ramblings"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b>"Chinese New Year's ramblings"</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOkI3aMcIV2oyuqJ7nd-NUkTF0NAbggkv9IE3Dy6REuQVbifggk-sh_KH-DkYB5g2IFG7RZvVwBnO9FZgW9x85fFSxoPv2XJ4GMOAECNTOtJz0Mc6vqVcbuqSzR9U7bl4rXrCT_vsG0ywj5X_sPf00880eFbHleQzJWBIOcjgFKHG7dM-ANnrfhRr5B7w/s4032/IMG_1190.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="4032" data-original-width="3024" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOkI3aMcIV2oyuqJ7nd-NUkTF0NAbggkv9IE3Dy6REuQVbifggk-sh_KH-DkYB5g2IFG7RZvVwBnO9FZgW9x85fFSxoPv2XJ4GMOAECNTOtJz0Mc6vqVcbuqSzR9U7bl4rXrCT_vsG0ywj5X_sPf00880eFbHleQzJWBIOcjgFKHG7dM-ANnrfhRr5B7w/s320/IMG_1190.jpeg" width="240" /></a></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">The smoke of incense fills the air </div><div style="text-align: center;">Out of tales that this would evade spirits from every lair </div><div style="text-align: center;">Whilst casts a fragrant scent such delight </div><div style="text-align: center;">Enough to say casts out the horrible blight </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">I hear the continuous incantations and prayers </div><div style="text-align: center;">As of trying to bring comfort to the one suffers </div><div style="text-align: center;">After enduring a days, weeks, to years full of strife </div><div style="text-align: center;">That makes one think when to have a good life? </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">As I traverse the streets expect them wishing luck </div><div style="text-align: center;">Despite trying to escape from hardships themselves locked </div><div style="text-align: center;">Be it through prayers to that of various sweetmeats </div><div style="text-align: center;">Sold by vendors to passers-meet </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Of course, the majority would have smiles </div><div style="text-align: center;">Trying to stave off the problems even awhile </div><div style="text-align: center;">As they see the dragon and lion dances </div><div style="text-align: center;">To that of beggars trying to imitate the former's prances </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">If not looking at the bright lights </div><div style="text-align: center;">Again enough to stave everyday blights </div><div style="text-align: center;">Especially after lighting all the fireworks </div><div style="text-align: center;">Bringing storms against hell and its work </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">In seeing such events makes me wonder </div><div style="text-align: center;">That as the yesterday's rabbit finally prances out and the dragon breaks heavens astunder </div><div style="text-align: center;">How come it is still the same with various blunders </div><div style="text-align: center;">Seeing same bullshit published in the papers? </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Perhaps I have to pray and work better </div><div style="text-align: center;">Trying to count blessings even further </div><div style="text-align: center;">Despite everything that makes life harder </div><div style="text-align: center;">The dictum is clear: counter fire with water </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> For the fact that behind their joy is worry </div><div style="text-align: center;">Behind their glee is sorry </div><div style="text-align: center;">Behind their wishes is a supplication, a plea </div><div style="text-align: center;">Behind the festivity a call for freedom as we seek </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> Pardon if my thoughts becoming political </div><div style="text-align: center;">For reality itself made us less biblical </div><div style="text-align: center;">Especially when those words trying to be "practical" </div><div style="text-align: center;">Trumps that of those whose foundations as "moral" </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> But in the end these observations turned one's tradition into ours </div><div style="text-align: center;">As Chung-Hua's new year is as same holiday's as Christmas and Labour's </div><div style="text-align: center;"> Especially in this godless order whose continuity is injustice and oppression </div><div style="text-align: center;">Let there be dragons as we say we'll bring hell into their delusion!</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-91149740034002545482024-02-06T11:01:00.000-08:002024-02-15T07:42:32.851-08:00 Reviving Intramuros, old Manila, and its surroundings: is it really for the community or just to please the eyes?
<p class="p1"></p><div style="text-align: center;"><b>Reviving Intramuros, old Manila, and its surroundings:</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>is it really for the community or just to please the eyes?</b></div><p></p><p class="p1"></p><div style="text-align: center;">By Lualhati Madlangawa-Guererro</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><p></p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">It's been a recent topic these days the idea of reviving Intramuros and its surroundings in Manila. Be it the pedestrianised streets to that of the reopening of the river esplenade, reviving the "city within the walls" has been a topic in heritage circles and has created mixed reactions to it. However, if one may ask, is the reviving benefited the community itself? Or for aesthetics sake?</p><p class="p1"></p><div style="text-align: justify;">In one article entitled "Make Intramuros a living history museum" yours truly wonder since the author talks about history, heritage, and the need for reviving, why it has to emphasise aesthetics at the expanse of the community that made the walled district living? Impressive would say the thought of reviving for the sake of history and heritage, but should it be at the expense of the people that kept the district moving?</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><p></p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Comparing Intramuros and Colonial Williamsburg</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">As yours truly was reading the paper, Joel Ruiz Butuyan, the author gave Colonial Williamsburg in Virginia as an example. According to him, Colonial Williamsburg's historic district, which perfectly captures the ambiance and way of life of the 1700s, is regarded as the largest living history museum in the world. Scattered across a 122-hectare expanse are several hundred structures that were reproduced or refurbished in accordance with colonial-era architecture, in addition to 89 restored 18th-century buildings. Among the buildings from the colonial era are the Governor's Palace, the Capitol, the courthouse, the prison, the military camp, the hospital, the church, and the inns.</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">However, Butuyan finds it fascinating that the location allowed visitors to experience life as it was in the 18th century. In addition, he claims that there are pubs that serve historical fare and beverages, a market square where goods from the era are offered for sale, and a theater that hosts or exhibits entertainments from the 18th century. Craftsmen during the colonial era include carpenters, tailors, shoemakers, wigmakers, blacksmiths, and silversmiths. Their creations can be purchased or displayed. Many of the workers in the historic region are trained to speak in archaic English, and they wear clothing from the 18th century as they go about their daily lives, doing chores, and conducting business.</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Nice if one may say, but to put the example of Colonial Williamsburg in the still-living and working district of Intramuros seems to be an ideal thought- for behind the beauteous setting of spanish-era buildings is a community that kept the district living and thriving. Of course the district needs regulations to keep the place in order, but to replicate? Again find it ideal if not idyllic for tourism's sake as Colonial Williamsburg is really presented as a living-history museum managed by a private foundation presenting a part of the historic district in the city of Williamsburg, Virginia. Everything is all but "rehearsed" as it tries to reflect the setting of the colonial era as that of the restored buildings. Intramuros, on the other hand, although managed by the government-led "Intramuros Administration" is more than just a city within the walls full of old and rebuilt, or recreated structures- it is a working living community that's in need of recognition and inclusivity in its quest for revival. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Both places did truly committed to promoting history and preserving its heritage, but there are major differences that's to recognise upon. Whereas Colonial Williamsburg is managed by a private institution, a “theme park” that’s populated with historical reenactors to compliment the restored if not rebuilt setting, whereas Intramuros is not, but rather a working district both managed by a government agency whose purpose is to to orderly restore, administer, and develop the historic walled area; while its barangays representing Manila’s Local Government, carries the task of ensuring order and providing services to its local constituents residing within and surrounding its walls. Together, the Intramuros Administration and the Manila City Government, along with the private sector, did sound efforts to revive, preserve, and uphold for present and future generations, benefiting its inhabitants, tourists, and other sectors involved; but, in reading Butuyan's suggestion- that of a "cultural Disneyland" it sidelines, if not forgets the community that keeps the district living in favor of the idyllic setting Intramuros should be.</p><p class="p1"></p><div style="text-align: justify;">And that also means a prolonged debate.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><p></p><p class="p1"></p><div style="text-align: justify;">Recognising the community within the walls</div><div style="text-align: justify;">(and how the community is willing to support efforts for reviving)</div><p></p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Why yours truly did say that Butuyan's suggestions forgets that of the community within the walls? That by saying he wants a "Cultural Disneyland" patterned that of Colonial Williamsburg in Intramuros shows how ideal would be especially "in the name of tourism". True that the intent is to showcase the surrounds of the past, but, the demographics of the district has been changed for generations- with seamen, students, middle-class employees and owners of variety stores, eateries, and dormitories replacing that of its supposed residents who once served as the bureaucrats serving both the city and the country. The latter have all moved out to districts like Ermita or Malate during the American era, or that of Forbes and San Lorenzo during the early years of the Republic; So, out of something that's ideal should the ones existing, benefiting, and contributing be removed in favour of what is pleasing to the eyes? It's no different from proclaiming that Intramuros is an enclave of the rich simply because of its lawns as a golf course- while within the walls a "cultural Disneyland" for those who can afford to enter.</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Besides, there’s Acuzar’s “Las Casas” that according to its developer tries to replicate the historical setting although controversial as this involves houses that meant to be part of a specific community such as Manila’s- of old houses being moved piece by piece and be “restored” to its past condition. This may sound closer to Colonial Williamsburg mr. Butuyan was pondering upon- especially that there are those who able to replicate the period complete with horse-drawn carriages, replicas of tranvias, even old jeepneys. There’s also drama featuring the life of Jose Rizal, as well as serving the food that tries to replicate that of the olden times. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">But since there are those who think this project brought by Mr. Acuzar should also happen in Intramuros, then it means debate as it affects various sectors. For as the never-ending issue deals about the enclave, its community, and its quest for architectural revival- for what kind of revival Intramuros or its surroundings within Old Manila should be? Yours truly may've read various suggestions some of which are considerable and involves inclusivity; but Butuyan's suggestion may sound quite extreme and exclusive for others, knowing that it means recreating everything 19th century for tourism's sake- but again, there's Las Casas to begin with if he wishes that way, he can pay a certain amount just to enjoy the setting he thinks "that should happen in Intramuros".</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">For despite recognising how tourism brings income to the walled enclave, then how about the schools, the stores, restaurants, the logistics and shipping offices as well as dormitories and even parking spaces that benefits the community? Tourists can go on a weekend walk visiting every church, paying a fee to visit a museum, or buy in a souvenir shop and dine at a restaurant within the walls; but everyday students from Letran, Mapua, and the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila attend their classes in the campuses located within the walls- so is some staying in its dormitories, eating at roadside eateries, lucky enough if there's a fastfood chain or a convenience store for some air-conditioned setting. Just find it question provoking the thought why for the sake of beauty the district has to become a gentrified space, a "cultural Disneyland" that benefits tourists at the expense of the community. Wouldn't be surprised if this happens to be Las Casas, but despite efforts to revive, to revitalise the city within the walls, Intramuros is no Las Casas of Bagac- for despite having old houses and iconic structures, these carries a purpose other than pleasing the eyes and minds of tourists: it is a community where everyone lives, works, studies! Why would these people be sidelined in favour of those who just go to see a rehearsed surrounding? </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">How about motor vehicles in the area? Should be “Car-less?” “Car-free?”</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">On the other hand, this note acknowledges the need for limits in motorised vehicles passing over Intramuros. Especially with the recent developments to improve tourism would say that the pedestrianisation of some streets find it helpful to make the place walkable and to protect the integrity of the structures built, as well as some roads can be narrow only to see cars driving around. although there are some tend to be quite extreme particularly conveying the thoughts of making the walled district “car-free”- and that would say quite idealistic.</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">However, it's a common misperception that car-free cities and districts forbid car ownership altogether, particularly in areas that were intended to be pedestrian-only. “Car free” or for accuracy’s sake, “car less” generally mean fewer cars rather than no cars so vary from restricting the use of vehicles in certain areas or designated streets to removing parking spaces. Reduced car usage or restrictions in particular areas are common features of car-free programs. Car ownership and driving is still permitted for locals and businesses. However, there are other options that are more accessible and actively encouraged, like ride-sharing, walking, cycling, and public transportation. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">People would like to live in towns with less air pollution, fewer accidents, and more areas set aside for pedestrians. Cars take up a lot of urban space, therefore it's important to take that into account. Additionally, fewer personal cars can ease the chronic space shortage felt in districts. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">For instance, in Manhattan, parking lots and roadways take up around 25% of the total area of the borough, this of course is a major problem to begin with; on the other hand, Oslo has transformed over 700 parking spaces into bike lanes, parks, and benches. Similarly, Paris plans to remove 70,000 parking spaces in the city to make way for active transport lanes. These are driven by the need to make cities livable and inclusive for all, rather than those who own automobiles of sorts- and of course, this should also happen in the Philippines, especially in the old districts. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;"> To be honest, people may find the idea riddled with misconception especially when private car ownership is at odds with those who have not, what more that there are other motor-driven vehicles such as pedicabs and motorcycles that also share the roads as that of pedal-driven ones. If to take the thought literally simply because of “hating the presence of automobiles” then this may also include that of other motor-driven vehicles as well due to environmental and safety reasons. But since they happened to be part of the community the thought of "low-traffic neighbourhoods" in old communities and districts is likewise than literally banning cars or any motor vehicles in the said area- for having limits on passing motor vehicles within the area in favour of pedestrians would be better than making the entire district prohibiting cars or any motor vehicles all for tourism’s sake. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Or is it because they hate cars or any motor vehicles? Pardon for the thought knowing that the idea of having the entire district prohibit passing motor vehicles sounds extreme. Why? Haven’t they forgot that the district also has offices dedicated to logistics and shipping? As well as having printing offices located there? Even the buses of schools located at Intramuros also passed within the area too. Should these establishments be moved out as well? Again these happened to be part of the community- and they obliged to observe regulations regarding vehicle use within the vicinity. Furthermore there are also paid parking areas for car-owning visitors who ought to visit the walled district particularly churchgoers who wanted to visit the Manila Cathedral on Sundays. True that these folks would say are being advised by authorities to have alternative means of transport especially on days certain roads being dedicated to pedestrians in order to improve mobility in the area. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;">Perhaps it would agreeable on the idea that of limiting access on motor vehicles the way the Duke of Gloucester Street and other historic area thoroughfares in Colonial Williamsburg are closed to motorized vehicles during the day, in favor of pedestrians, bicyclists, joggers, dog walkers, and animal-drawn vehicles. Mr. Butuyan and others would agree on this, that visitors may park at the Visitor's Center, as automobiles are restricted from the restored area, while wheelchair-accessible shuttle service is provided to stops around the perimeter of the Historic District. In the case of Intramuros would say that a dedicated shuttle service will do, aside from prioritising pedestrians, cyclists, and smaller vehicles whilst limiting that of motorised ones on days or hours in certain roads. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: center;">***</p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;"> It is not surprise that there are people wanted a Potemkin town for tourism reasons, so expect them to talk about whatever appeals to their eyes, even at the expense of the community that supports it. They would suggest that by expelling the existing “squatting” residents for a Potemkin town would flourish tourism alone and therefore means developmenr, having “existing structures inside Intramuros that can be restored to their 19th-century grandeur with colonial-era homes and business establishments can be reconstructed in vacant lots.” If so, let it be. But, for the sake of reality, would one suggest that by imposing their ideas on an already existing community? It appears that they are more concerned with the beauty than with the life that makes the location worthwhile. Being a guest for a while would suggest that there is a real need for order in that place, while also understanding the need for inclusivity in that particular community, especially since without them, the site is very useless, regardless of the history carved in it. </p><p class="p1" style="text-align: justify;"> In this remark, yours truly mentioned that, while admitting the need for improvement, it must go beyond aesthetics and focus more on livability and community in light of the recent developments in Intramuros and its environs over Old Manila. Expect it to be selective—some things are agreeable and worthy of discussion, while others are debatable and, therefore, subject to some disagreement. It is quite agreeable that Colonial Williamsburg states its objective with these words: "That the future may learn from the past" and so must be followed by people who value legacy and identity. However, as time passes, expect changes in the said area and the community that keeps it living, particularly those that ensure the place's sustainability regardless of its status; otherwise, it will become a shell of what it once was. They simply need to be included in the development process since they are willing to put things in order as if that benefits themselves. </p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-62679516625482148862024-01-29T16:19:00.000-08:002024-02-26T07:54:18.936-08:00"Keeping the flames of Patriotism burning."<div style="text-align: center;"><b>"Keeping the flames of Patriotism burning."</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b><br></b></div><div style="text-align: center;">A Rizal Day Message</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;">This note sends greetings to the folk this celebration of Rizal Day. </div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> As any other "National Holiday" would say that Rizal's life should be idealised by many because of his patriotism, what more his courage, talent, and the willingness to sacrifice in pursuit of a greater goal such as for country and people.
And like any other person, Rizal himself was a visionary, a man of immense courage and intellect who believed in the power of knowledge to ignite change. People may've known him for his written works "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo", of his "Letter to the Women of Malolos" to that of his contributions durinh his exile in Dapitan. His yearn for reforms to his recognition of the need for revolution has taught every walk of life an unwavering love of country, his fervent desire for freedom, and his commitment to justice that even in this continuing past those truly concerned should continue to inculcate. </div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> The current order, as in the past will only be talked out of the country and its people through threat and coercion. That by pretending they're for democracy and human rights, including that of praising Rizal and other heroes obviously these are empty words as opposed to the unjust truths such as silencing those who oppose their self-centered interests. </div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> This note need not to be longer. But like Rizal and other heroes and martyrs of the past and present would say that it becomes a duty for a patriot to keep the flames of nationalism burning in everyone's hearts and minds. Quite agreeable that his legacy shouldn't be just limit to his written works being studied, but also heed the call for action- and that includes facing the risk and pain that one has to endure in pursuit of a belief in a society that's just, and by enduring will draw an immense strength that would counter those who oppress.
</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-23928466501726960282024-01-26T06:51:00.000-08:002024-02-24T09:43:42.944-08:00 How about the local assemblers? Will the "Jeepney Modernisation" program revive and promote them?<div style="text-align: center;"><b>How about the local assemblers? </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>Will the "Jeepney Modernisation" program </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>revive and promote them?</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br></div><div style="text-align: center;">By Kat Ulrike</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;">It’s been weeks passed as jeepney drivers and operators welcomed the new year with continued calls for the junking of the “modernisation program”, those who support the program, especially big businesses, are already taking advantage of the loss of traditional jeepney units by importing new “modern jeepneys” to that of investing in electric vehicle companies in the country. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">The modernization program for jeepneys aims to swap out outdated vehicles with safer, more eco-friendly models. While it's true that a large number of conventional jeepneys emit smoke, others are already unsafe for the road, in disrepair, and frequently the reason for accidents. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">But to put these jeepney drivers' livelihoods in jeopardy? That isn't modernization since the absence of inclusion demonstrates that the program serves the interests of the wealthy at the expense of passengers, drivers, operators, and assemblers. It's true that the government has to modernize the jeepney fleet; however, this needs to happen in a fair, inclusive manner that benefits all the sectors impacted by the program, and that includes helping local automakers produce better, safer, and more effective vehicles. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Speaking of the program, how about the local assemblers? </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Ever since the program has been approved, it became an object of discussion, if not debate whether the program should prioritise local assemblers over that of importers. There were many models offered by local assemblers ranging from locally-assembled minibuses to that of modernised jeepneys. The latter, which most drivers find it well-maintained, find it affordable as opposed to the imported minibuses promoted by the authorities. However, this modernisation program prioritises much of downsizing public utility transport using “consolidation” through corporations and “cooperatives” in order for them to gain modern public utility vehicles courtesy of- importers and supported by bureaucrats.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">But how about the local assemblers who offered sound alternatives to expensive, imported vehicles promoted by bureaucrats? According to the Collegian article, PISTON Women's Mira Molino said that there are local manufacturers capable of creating modern vehicles, but these are controlled by foreign owned companies- that according to the Philippine Economic Zone Authority, two Chinese, one American, and one Indonesian-owned enterprise are interested in selling contemporary jeeps in support of the modernisation program.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Some local businesses, though, have made the decision to support the majority. As jeepney modernisation continues to be debated, it becomes an issue for local assemblers to assert their role in improving that said transport system. Especially in a state wherein favours the importers or foreign makers than that of the local assemblers, it is obvious for the current order in having a particular way of "using" or "restricting" them with definite reasons to justify. But, regardless of the order’s skeptical replies, these establishments are open to participating in a transition toward modernizing public transit networks that is equitable, inclusive, and sustainable- for as drivers and operators sought to maintain their means of support and commuters sought reasonably priced transportation, these jeepney assemblers sought to safeguard their businesses even it requires adhering to government regulations regarding the installation of modern engines, and better interiors, to that of air conditioning and surveillance cameras. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">In an instance, Francisco Motors created an electric, updated jeepney that adheres to modern standards while maintaining the exterior design of a conventional jeepney. Furthermore, the company also offered a budget-friendly alternative to the government’s “modernisation program” that meant more debts to drivers and operators. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">As according to an article in the Philippine Star, Elmer Francisco assured jeepney drivers of financing options with his company's TsuperHero Program.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;"><br></i></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;">"With the TsuperHero Program of Francisco Motors, jeepney operators no longer need to borrow money from banks to buy our jeepneys because we have a much better program for them of which they will even earn more than what they are already earning," he said, adding that as of the moment, they are prioritizing their "own jeepney operators who have already consolidated with Francisco Motors before the December 31, 2023 deadline." </i><span style="text-align: left;">Francisco said.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;"><br></i></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;">"Other than these, we have already received Letters of Intent to purchase of over 37,500 units from various transport cooperatives and corporations of which we have already received over 1,300 units of purchase orders out of the 37,500 to date," </i><span style="text-align: left;">Francisco shared.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">For compared to the existing modern jeepneys that costs P1.6 million to P2.4 million, Francisco's jeepney costs approximately P1.8 million less for the first 1,000 units ($985,000). The decreased price provides jeepney operators, drivers, and cooperatives with an inexpensive opportunity to participate in the government's Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) without incurring debt.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Francisco also sells his e-jeepneys for a P50,000 down payment per unit, with flexible monthly payments of roughly P20,000 per month for only 32 months, as the government already gives an equity subsidy of P280,000 per unit under the PUVMP. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Will bureaucrats change minds for this? </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Even some bureaucrats expressed the need to support local assemblers like Francisco if the government is serious in its attempt for modernisation. For as the government urges drivers and operators to update their jeepneys, Albay 2nd District Joey Salceda proposed in 2023 that first enough support be provided to local jeepney producers, stating that Filipino-made vehicles may be efficient and environmentally friendly.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">In an article from the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the congressman explained his suggestion on the needs of jeepney modernisation:</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;"><br></i></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;">“I would summarize my proposal in three points: First, support domestic manufacturing of more modern and more efficient, but similarly stylish jeepneys. Second, increase the subsidy per unit to meet the financial viability gap. Third, buy out old jeepneys for cash,”</i><span style="text-align: left;"> Salceda said. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;"><br></i></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;">“If we can bring the cost of the unit to P600,000 to P1 million, that becomes more realistic for both the jeepney operator, and on a cost-benefit basis. I think the domestic manufacturing sector can do it. But we need to support them,”</i><span style="text-align: left;"> he added.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Senator Tulfo also expressed support in encouraging local assemblers for the modernisation program as he criticises imported minibuses from China. In an article from the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the senator questioned the decision to import the vehicles from China at a high cost, claiming that the PUVMP "reeks of corruption" because a local jeepney manufacturer could produce the identical units for much less. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;"><br></i></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i style="text-align: left;">“Our waters in the West Philippine Sea are already being claimed by China. Are we even going to allow them to take over our roads as well?!”</i><span style="text-align: left;"> Tulfo said, criticising China’s involvement. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">The senator also observed that imported jeepneys from China cost P2.6 to P2.9 million per unit, which is far more expensive than brand new units from local manufacturers, who can produce modernized jeepneys for only P900,000 to P985,000 each.
He went on to say that choosing a local manufacturer over a Chinese company will save the government around P1.7 million per unit. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Not surprising that there are those who are patriotic enough to encourage local assemblers to engage in the venture. Salceda's suggestion of letting the government buy old jeepneys may sound enticing for drivers in order to buy new locally-made jeepneys, while Tulfo's call for prioritising local assemblers provide opportunities in locally-made transport systems but also to revisit the local manufacturing program that's stalled thanks to neoliberalism and cheap infux of secondhand vehicles and spare parts.</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">To some would say the attempt by local assemblers as costly in comparison to importing. After all, "importing is cheaper" as what they perceive if not importing vehicles will compel local assemblers to “compete” despite having less support from the state nor having no national efforts in industrialising the country. But if one may ask, when was the time the country was serious in undertaking a goal of domestic based development particularly through industrialisation? PUV modernisation is more than just promoting and encouraging local assemblers to create modern transport, but rather as part of the will to pursue industrialisation in order to foster further innovation as to support local needs and effect economic emancipation. Oligarchs and banksters beg to disagree on this given their contentment in commerce and trade- and that includes keeping the country agricultural, resource-extracting, services, and even remittances. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Honestly speaking, these bureaucrats stated in this note and its concern can also be part rhetoric as the entire establishment chose to continue with that controversial program with or without heeding from the affected sectors- for industrialisation was and is, still seen as a stumbling block into their view of development as succeeding administrations failed to harness further industry for the growing country. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; text-align: left;">This note may talked about modernising public transport and the role of a still small local "industry" that's willing to engage in that venture, what more the desire to go even further?</span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Still, the need for modernisation should be just and inclusive </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Once more, transportation groups are not opposed to the plan to "modernize" public utility vehicles, rather, they are opposed to the "questionable" schemes that initially justified the plan as "anti-poor," such as mandating the replacement of all traditional jeepneys with the justification that "these are no longer working" and the new models—mostly imported or made by large corporations—that bureaucrats are pushing are too costly for these low-income driver-operators. These parties are willing to improve the current jeepneys in order to make them more environmentally friendly and fuel-efficient, if not actively pushing local assemblers to offer more reasonably priced, superior local options to the pricy imports that officials supported. While Francisco, Sarao, and others are prepared to offer their own versions, the real question is whether the government would back local efforts in keeping with its election-year pledge to advance national development at the local level? </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">In addition, the government's idea of "cooperatives" may seem like a good way to justify consolidation by offering promises of higher pay and benefits, but as was mentioned in a post a few weeks ago, some drivers are dissatisfied with the program, seeing their enrollment result in nothing but losses in terms of money and meager earnings. These operators and drivers who pooled their funds to purchase these pricey "modern jeepneys" won't even be the proprietors of the vehicles. They therefore see no benefit from a phony "cooperative," but that plan, as insisted by the authorities compels single-unit operators to give up their means of subsistence since it takes away their route franchises, which go to large corporations and "transport cooperatives" as they risk having their franchises revoked for being "colorum" or unregistered. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">How about the local assemblers like Francisco, Sarao, and others who offered just alternatives to the exorbitantly-priced imported “modern jeepneys”? The government may’ve heed their responses, however, this doesn’t mean they affirm, let alone treated as an “option” as bureaucrats chose to side with the importers/or foreign companies (in cahoots wit local bigwigs) that able to “set up shop” with their expensive modern public utility vehicles. Furthermore, local assemblers are willing to create sound developments as they themselves able to to build, refurbish, and run vehicles- so is the capability to dismantle, recycle, and recreate according to the country’s needs. Remember- the country remains stagnant in its quest for industrialisation and it becomes necessary for these small and medium scale industries to be supported by the state in order to harness further creativity and growth. True what Brian James Lu said in an article from the Philippine News Agency that he presumes “the jeepneys shall be considered scrap and junk and we have hundreds of thousands of jeepneys.” The question is, will the modern jeepneys manufactured locally be affordable for the drivers who should replace their “scrap-level” ones? At what price will the government to buy these old jeepneys for the drivers to buy new ones? And, will these scrap/recycling facilities provide jobs and support efforts in developing new and modern transport systems or creating sustainable use of materials for various purposes? Scrap metal is still metal anyway. </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">Overall, these worried sectors would remark that, despite articulating simple desires such as preserving their right to livelihood, they sought an alternative to something imposed rather than negotiated and agreed. They wished to improve public transportation, but for the sake of truth, why should they insist on the question "at what cost?" For despite the demonstrators' valid requests, advocates of the program continue to believe that everyone who disagrees should be labeled as anti-environment, anti-commuter, or even subversive and seditious. To these supporters, the government's program is merely an order to follow, by force if necessarily, regardless of the desires of those who oppose it for a fair, inclusive program and the switch to contemporary public transportation. They would even go so far as to call all traditional jeepney drivers and operators "smoke belchers," and others "already decrepit and not roadworthy and are frequently the causes of accidents." </span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;">But will the establishment’s view prevail over those who are affected and concerned? Which is which?</span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-87455256348733223332024-01-20T01:06:00.000-08:002024-02-24T10:43:48.880-08:00Under a continuity of subservience: there's no social change in that "charter change" <div style="text-align: center;"><b>Under a continuity of subservience: </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>there's no social change in that "charter change" </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br></div><div style="text-align: center;"> By Kat Ulrike </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> It is quite easier to blame the constitution for all the woes the country has faced. Be it political dynasties, corruption, to that of "economic provisions", the constitution as what critics claimed, is worth blaming and thus needs amendment if not outright replacement. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> However, the problem is more than just the constitution itself- but systemic. The issue is itself centuries-past, and it has passed fundamental laws and constitutions, and yet it stays the same: benefiting landlords, big business, corrupt bureaucrats, political dynasties, foreign dominators that for those concerned been sought as the real problems. </div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> To blame the 1987 constitution without even thinking the problem as systemic may sound easier to conclude that social change would happen if fundamental laws are to be amended. But reality becomes otherwise as changing it has less fo do with resolving social problems and more to do with aggravating it- especially with those who advocate charter change have more to do with their entrenched interests, alongside the willingness to opon further in the guise of "economic development".</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> But nevertheless, interest seekers, local and foreign alike have long kept the Philippines poor and underdeveloped. They have to feign patriotism especially "national survival" to justify their neoliberal/globalist intent, they would even blame the "oligarchs" and yet kowtows to foreign banksters for "investment", if one may ask, since they find the laws not enough be it the Jomes Act or the current 1987 constitution; but did it truly benefit the people? Maybe, maybe not. </div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Perhaps, no matter they change the fundamental law of the land, opened the country to foreigners, yet seeing the same order benefits from it then it's crystal clear bullshit. Nothing's wrong in foreign direct investment tho, but does the country need to rely on so much? Singapore is an exception being an island city-state with its existing port and financial center; China? Deng's opening up is itself a "measure" that's "for a time being" as part of building socialism. However, the needed for foreign investment, according to neoliberals and globalists seemingly taking it to the extreme as that of willingness to surrender sovereignty to banksters and profiteers as that of corrupt bureaucrats and despotic landlords; oligarchs, be it local or foreign alike, will always bleed the people dry in the name of "development". If they afforded to claim they're as patriotic, or even nationalistic as that of the sovereignists, then why the willingness to surrender sovereignty to the whims of the global market? Again, nothing's wrong in accommodating foreign direct investment, but to remove labour and environmental regulations, the right to fair wages, enforced austerity with attempts to cut government spending on social programs? It is bullshit! That neoliberalism which primarily concerned with markets over people has run concurrent with a rise in inequality in both wealth and income, what more the presence of monopolies, which increase the profits of corporations at the expense of benefits to consumers. Hence, the angst against the oligarchs may sound reasonable but to support policies that also benefited the oligarch? Uphold or eveb reform neoliberal capitalism? Again, it is bullshit!</div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> In short, no constitution, no type of government, and no coterie of sorts will really "change the nation" as long as the sociopolitical order stays the same. The masses demand social justice, industrialization, land reform, respect for fundamental human rights, national freedom, and real democracy instead of continuing in a state of reliance, subordination, and oppression. The people will not stand for the ruling class in Congress coming up with self-serving proposals to amend the Constitution. </div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-78040836100953895712024-01-09T10:53:00.000-08:002024-01-10T23:30:58.222-08:00"My Kingdom is Not of this World": Thoughts on the Traslacion 2024 <div style="text-align: center;"><b>"My Kingdom is Not of this World":</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>Thoughts on the Traslacion 2024</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b><br /></b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b><br /></b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXLfnEIhWO6nuHUQGxzIlR5nO1AxMuK-GNvDFYI629jrmPgHt9_N1oP75xAD2M8PqCVKjvveGhKYlXNltSTj2hlniOTenlgdkpmDidZ_ysML6M3Rp9IwlNz5xyy3LkdeNo8c3PHKcgtMNkFGJ0nJIceKY4sw9rrhS0Zd0TJtGKSpNm4eq5-n_mFjf1O3U/s1233/78108868-C516-46C3-83A7-EEA00D77D404.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1233" data-original-width="1014" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXLfnEIhWO6nuHUQGxzIlR5nO1AxMuK-GNvDFYI629jrmPgHt9_N1oP75xAD2M8PqCVKjvveGhKYlXNltSTj2hlniOTenlgdkpmDidZ_ysML6M3Rp9IwlNz5xyy3LkdeNo8c3PHKcgtMNkFGJ0nJIceKY4sw9rrhS0Zd0TJtGKSpNm4eq5-n_mFjf1O3U/s320/78108868-C516-46C3-83A7-EEA00D77D404.jpeg" width="263" /></a></div><br /><b><br /></b></div><div><b><br /></b></div><div><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj0KJRk70uqBNjB_2A_PbF_u8B3BdQV_vEa4BYEOBX1P-8SlcPoH8Yz9IUs8TQnx-wz6mCbNVhNv0XwyU8-tOg2_BxqSzg3QgmjS2EXYI5jmWXcxbti5lWD2Gif0dl6uggNNL_EY5igeRStIejsrinnpuiomjWlINaMEC9HKRyPU7ZPao83rPSJtnlIK2Y/s1600/IMG_0451.jpeg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1066" data-original-width="1600" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj0KJRk70uqBNjB_2A_PbF_u8B3BdQV_vEa4BYEOBX1P-8SlcPoH8Yz9IUs8TQnx-wz6mCbNVhNv0XwyU8-tOg2_BxqSzg3QgmjS2EXYI5jmWXcxbti5lWD2Gif0dl6uggNNL_EY5igeRStIejsrinnpuiomjWlINaMEC9HKRyPU7ZPao83rPSJtnlIK2Y/s320/IMG_0451.jpeg" width="320" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Source: <a href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1886783/nazareno-2024-generally-peaceful-pnp">Inquirer.net</a></span></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">This 2024 commemorates the physical return of the Traslación of the image of Jesus Christ as the Black Nazarene, four years since it was last held before the COVID-19 pandemic shut down the City of Manila and the rest of the Philippines.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
Millions of barefoot devotees are expected to touch, kiss, or wipe cloth on the Black Nazarene, a 17th-century image of Jesus Christ carrying His cross, as part of the event commemorating its transfer from the Church of San Juan Bautista in Bagumbayan (present-day "Rizal Park") to its new home, the Church of St. John the Baptist in Quiapo district, Manila. The image is believed to be miraculous.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
However, the image being pulled by many is in a glass enclosure, a sound system, and a Closed Circuit Television (CCTV); even surrounded by around 20 "Hijos del Nazareno" members to prevent devotees from climbing onto the image. And yet despite warnings not to get close to it, devotees rather cling to the "tradition" of touching or wiping cloth in its image- for again they still believe in its powers, whether it can heal previously incurable ailments or to bring good fortune to them and their loved ones.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuOnoELD37vOYrUChjrN4jgMQQC9hhKJBX1YSRmHxu1Pw7xyODMI9z7Pg78TtjDjDdXyl8BCA0isOfbvY5BMoRH_oJXAQnIXH8n0FYhW3LLlqUaFacFZ2aoLbXJJnI94BNEAGXZwTUG7zxJFsDQhzQ7KIzMLnu9t1gEiwgda530NogidYhPSmalXNbDfI/s4032/IMG_0374.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3024" data-original-width="4032" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuOnoELD37vOYrUChjrN4jgMQQC9hhKJBX1YSRmHxu1Pw7xyODMI9z7Pg78TtjDjDdXyl8BCA0isOfbvY5BMoRH_oJXAQnIXH8n0FYhW3LLlqUaFacFZ2aoLbXJJnI94BNEAGXZwTUG7zxJFsDQhzQ7KIzMLnu9t1gEiwgda530NogidYhPSmalXNbDfI/s320/IMG_0374.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
But, despite this popular religiosity, this act of faith shown by most devotees is seen by critics as driven by material wishes than spiritual graces. Of course it is easy to dismiss them knowing that the reasons behind their devotion is that of material- and therefore easy to paint these devotees as fanatics especially when you see the multitude of people scrambling just to touch, to get a glimpse (and therefore disobeying orders for "tradition's sake"); but, cannot blame them on their actions for from these devotee's way of believing in Jesus Christ as the Black Nazarene is itself an authentic faith experience- that those who touch the image, wiping it with cloth, or that they were praying, many were crying or pleading for guidance because something happened to them in their visits, helping to resolve their problems be it spiritual or material. After all, in seeing them it becomes a valid expression of the people’s need to commune with the divine.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirdtgdrQIiS4Y3rjTKgavBGdKAHAO_otl9ETPegv8JEhSONQ64D8jaJcj7PUgOWmgwYIJdCjaQ7vCXieDzeFSwtWspycZZA3PIAe6BE-sCdTX69PcfgPJ8n4Cn8XVINDC0DWktCtdwhlcrX0YXVCQh3YvtWDJV0spZY18tH4OQ_qSCwQE5BQoIsXa2CPM/s1791/1C52DBB0-1902-4021-A27A-5C287B69C7AB.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1791" data-original-width="1440" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirdtgdrQIiS4Y3rjTKgavBGdKAHAO_otl9ETPegv8JEhSONQ64D8jaJcj7PUgOWmgwYIJdCjaQ7vCXieDzeFSwtWspycZZA3PIAe6BE-sCdTX69PcfgPJ8n4Cn8XVINDC0DWktCtdwhlcrX0YXVCQh3YvtWDJV0spZY18tH4OQ_qSCwQE5BQoIsXa2CPM/s320/1C52DBB0-1902-4021-A27A-5C287B69C7AB.jpeg" width="257" /></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;">
As an observer, would say that their devotion tries itself to be genuine, especially after the abuses that have developed through centuries of tradition. As said earlier it becomes less spiritual and more material in their motivation to get close to the Black Nazarene, and thus not from the expression of people’s faith, but from those who manipulate the devotion; it may also become fanatical as some failed to focus on God and Christ and instead into their own self and their egoes, desires. Thus, it becomes a duty for the faithful, aside from the Church for fellow devotees to better understand their faith and to put things in their right perspective- and it takes a long time for people for them to trying to help and guide the people and understand more the catechism and really get closer to Christ as the Black Nazarene. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Perhaps, in this current unjust order would say that by making people guide and understand the reason for devotion is more than simply the material want and even spiritual need- that "Christ's Kingdom is not of this world" and that by building a just society on earth as Christ envisioned includes cultivating moral and social virtues in themselves and spread them in society, that includes the need for freedom, justice, solidarity, love, and a lasting peace by any means. After all, it is what the substance of Christ's messianic mission and ministry on earth, which he himself said: </div><div style="text-align: justify;"> "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach the good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord" (Lk 4:18-19; cf. Is 61:1-2).</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghYbFIJnBlkYy-wiavFvQOEfF0IEnBH5FkbfOZr9FsswxjWBR2Ed_FbOO4lf70tccfpOsGa-XHRWBnEueKbxi6r7MbGma81EVd8DLCC4pdexmJSVClGSqduJeiO_dprZbMCTKQSvqHhXIQgskx6LgXAw91S_xYi9wAKyKn09cOoGWm95ax3U-aHA0SfaA/s4032/IMG_0386.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3024" data-original-width="4032" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghYbFIJnBlkYy-wiavFvQOEfF0IEnBH5FkbfOZr9FsswxjWBR2Ed_FbOO4lf70tccfpOsGa-XHRWBnEueKbxi6r7MbGma81EVd8DLCC4pdexmJSVClGSqduJeiO_dprZbMCTKQSvqHhXIQgskx6LgXAw91S_xYi9wAKyKn09cOoGWm95ax3U-aHA0SfaA/s320/IMG_0386.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> The devotees, as that of the faithful, wanted spiritual redemption so is the liberation from their suffering; they wished and working hard for a life of a world to come to happen on earth as that of pulling the ropes, accompanying the image on top of the carriage for long hours, enduring bump, sweat, and pain to gain the grace as they themselves mostly from the toiling masses and the disenfranchised. Their cries for help towards Christ that is, focused on justice for the poor, as poverty of the exploited and oppressed, the weak and the indigent, as evil; the prophetic tradition that condemns fraud, usury, and gross injustice as causes of poverty (cf. Isaiah 58:3-11; Jeremiah 7:4-7; Hosea 4:1-2; Amos 2:6-7; Micah 2:1-2).
</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixpz2IpyIaV-y44s9qRttegP_MIxlmCPz10WJUFh8n10pZTpGcGCiGLEc4jYFiLEpJh5XYAwB4H0MDrtjzrNHcnXOwP4TmY4ngFSkWf3l1JFPdaF-yNjog3-bxmbRdOzUY2kqxiM0IP_UlKAVZ67G9obYeD7N_O_UFRKXZcMH7p_XF9YwHXgcfQvyIUAU/s2880/1D60DE12-F4EE-46E9-9DCD-3E3AAA223A0C.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2160" data-original-width="2880" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixpz2IpyIaV-y44s9qRttegP_MIxlmCPz10WJUFh8n10pZTpGcGCiGLEc4jYFiLEpJh5XYAwB4H0MDrtjzrNHcnXOwP4TmY4ngFSkWf3l1JFPdaF-yNjog3-bxmbRdOzUY2kqxiM0IP_UlKAVZ67G9obYeD7N_O_UFRKXZcMH7p_XF9YwHXgcfQvyIUAU/s320/1D60DE12-F4EE-46E9-9DCD-3E3AAA223A0C.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div>Pardon to be inspired by the scripture as the writer observed the event, for as the folk are in solidarity and in communion with the divine, their pleas for grace, their desire to fulfill their wishes, dreams, and aspirations; doesn't stop with the event itself or its holy days, the need for awakening and solidarity in this time of struggle becomes necessary as the faithful urges one to enlight and fight against systemic ills for the attainment of the common good. Yes, the Kingdom is not of this world- but it becomes a duty of the faithful to fight the systemic ill that hinders growth and corrupts morality so as to build a just society on this earth for the world to come.</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-51852279650220670102024-01-09T02:58:00.000-08:002024-01-10T03:19:25.440-08:00Rekindling the faith to face the struggle <div style="text-align: center;"><b>Rekindling the faith to face the struggle</b> </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> By Kat Ulrike </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUuhAhnTHTkKpSp0uZSyhQzdjYmVbbLIWcZ3xi717U5nWq0C1qdggP6-9VPU91b-UMMOgcv0KeWKXx_tgb53nks2pGGLwwZHu4CbTFRJU4txaDEwMv7TEYo0WVIRL7tWM-MwUjArDyEOSSpEfpaJoZvFCEBVsfkYpI2LS-BojblgHvP-t8C2x2wunzGPE/s4032/IMG_0374.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3024" data-original-width="4032" height="240" id="id_b19f_d036_875c_da64" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUuhAhnTHTkKpSp0uZSyhQzdjYmVbbLIWcZ3xi717U5nWq0C1qdggP6-9VPU91b-UMMOgcv0KeWKXx_tgb53nks2pGGLwwZHu4CbTFRJU4txaDEwMv7TEYo0WVIRL7tWM-MwUjArDyEOSSpEfpaJoZvFCEBVsfkYpI2LS-BojblgHvP-t8C2x2wunzGPE/s320/IMG_0374.jpeg" style="height: auto; width: 320px;" width="320" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div style="text-align: justify;">It's been few years passed as everyone tries to recover after the pandemic. As people from all walks of life working hard for their every lives, so is their effort in rekindling their faith to support their still fragile lives.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Especially in this last day of yuletide season in Quiapo, Manila when devotees of the most holy Black Nazarene converged together to pray, seek forgiveness, and plead for spiritual assistance for their everyday lives. At first would say most of them are driven by material wants as they encounter, pray, and seek help; but as time goes by this note would say that in every devotee they're trying their outmost bests to transcend from their material wants and into spiritual needs- as Jesus Christ himself, through the image of the Black Nazarene instill in everyone, not just the devotees, the need for love, courage, and hope in facing everyday struggles.</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">But, will these hardships prevail and people be contented? No! These devotees, in walking barefoot from their homes and into Quiapo Church for the Black Nazarene wanted more than seeking, luck, miracles, or redemption as they touch or wanting to wipe their towel in the image; but a desire for liberation. Call it radical this hell of a kind message, but in this current unjust order it becomes justifiable to be enlight and to fight. True that everyday is a Panata, every action is a Traslacion, and in every month is a Kwaresma, but the goal of these is to "cultivate moral and social virtues in themselves and spread them in society." (Compedium). </div><div style="text-align: justify;">And as Christians would say that in cultivating moral and social values includes that of proclaiming the good news of liberation and national and class freedom, and of denouncing oppression and repression as ever more relevant and imperative today in the light of prevailing systemic injustice- for the fact that is the revolutionary legacy of Jesus Christ who stood up against the oppressive Roman Empire and its vassal King Herod while proclaimed the good news of liberation to the poor and oppressed that made the faithful adhere to its liberatative character. For sure everyone recalls the Magnificat, the Beatitudes, and the Acts of the Apostles as basis for this liberatative task.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9Su_CwVLdqRV7WytpKorwt3HrZTRIyWtPEDEHrp-Ny8fkUcwAMKW2baO9ty84Axnel60mukRiqK930bluVcWuLiAYChClZ5GG96RUpLFGW_mnfsv5POV6hkgxPvhabPg_Y6WL207u6wjCF6aO1gmFhZSQtXrQUk7WvG7DljTUmJwgMJahEvjccfl8P5E/s1233/78108868-C516-46C3-83A7-EEA00D77D404.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: justify;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1233" data-original-width="1014" height="320" id="id_94d9_1465_67a_87b8" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9Su_CwVLdqRV7WytpKorwt3HrZTRIyWtPEDEHrp-Ny8fkUcwAMKW2baO9ty84Axnel60mukRiqK930bluVcWuLiAYChClZ5GG96RUpLFGW_mnfsv5POV6hkgxPvhabPg_Y6WL207u6wjCF6aO1gmFhZSQtXrQUk7WvG7DljTUmJwgMJahEvjccfl8P5E/s320/78108868-C516-46C3-83A7-EEA00D77D404.jpeg" style="height: auto; width: 263px;" width="263" /></a><span style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: justify;">In witnessing the entire event would say that the desire for redemption itself becomes a need for liberation. Is Christianity all about "spiritual redemption" alone just to justify the existence of a repressive order as what the late Thatcher justified? Not surprising that there are those who once professed to have a just moral social order end capitulated to the whims of society's unjustness, citing "free will" to justify "free market ideas of consumer choice" to that of ambivalence towards democracy. No wonder why Basil Carinal Hume remaked Thatcher as "the lewder who thinks they're infallible." </div></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> In the case of Philippines, justifying an existing oppressive order using faith makes the belief becoming bullshit the way some clergymen trying to reduce the liberatative task of the church as a mere spiritual one if not supported by some piecemeal "act of kindness". Okay then that act of kindness, but is charity alone enough to suffice the social problems people encounter with? Why not fraternise, solidarise with the poor and the oppressed as to set the foundations of the kingdom on earth? Why not as well expose and oppose the injustices, corription, and oppression that prevailed in this earth for the world to come? The Devotees, mostly poor and downtrodden desired to see Christ and wanting to be cured and absolved, why should they be condemned still in a cycle instead of helping them break the chains that hinder their existence? </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> To cut this thought short, in seeing the events shows that there's a need to rekindle the faith in facing the struggle, what more to support it. And it is the duty of the faithful to guide to the just and right direction- that is a part of building a just and righteous kingdom on earth. </div></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-37634134460314404802024-01-06T10:54:00.000-08:002024-01-06T20:50:50.199-08:00Franchise Consolidation? Sounds like "Intrusion by Entrenched Interests."<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;"><b>Franchise Consolidation?</b></span></div><span style="text-align: left;"><div style="text-align: center;"><b>Sounds like "Intrusion by Entrenched Interests."</b></div></span><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div>Some weeks ago, this writer was reading an article from the Philippine Collegian about the controversial "Jeepney Modernisation Program." </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> The article, entitled "For Jeepney Drivers, Franchise Consolidation Spelled Financial Loss", shows the program, supposed to appear "empowering" with the creation of cooperatives and promises of support from the government to those who join, rather face the contrary- that of disempowered drivers with meagre earnings.
Because of the consolidation plan, jeepney drivers operating on a route are required to establish or join a cooperative or corporation in order to maintain their operating license. The PUVMP is opposed by groups because it forces PUV operators to take out expensive loans in order to purchase a "modern jeepney." </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i>“Emerson Bismonte, 45, has been a jeepney driver for 18 years plying the Pasig-Bagumbayan route. When the government announced that traditional jeepneys would be phased out in 2017, he immediately joined the public utility vehicle modernization program (PUVMP) in 2022 in hopes of keeping his livelihood.” </i>The article said.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><i>
“But as his earnings were not enough to sustain him and his family, after three months, he went back to driving traditional jeepneys.” </i>The article added. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Quite convincing at first for both operators and drivers who wished for improved mass transportation systems such as the Jeepney, or even the UV express; and some were willing to join the program in hopes of keeping their livelihood- with promises of modern jeepneys to use and “better income” would say that the program sound pleasing. <br />However, with contradictions such as threats of depriving their franchises for not joining, inadequate support, to that of "new" yet "deteriorating" "modern jeepneys", then no wonder protests against that "sham" program and the assertion of just, inclusive, and better alternatives are being called for by these affected sectors. Bismonte’s experience in driving a "modern jeepney" shows an inconvenient truth according to the article- that whereas being a traditional jeepney driver whom he as in charge able to earn P2,000 each day, the “modernisation program” in which modern jeepneys are owned by a “cooperative” or a private corporation, he as an "employee" takes home only P700 even if he earns the P4,000 daily quota. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">If one may ask, is the promise of a better living courtesy of that modernisation program really benefited the drivers? Supporters of the program says that by joining the cooperative/or the corporation, the driver pays well, and there were social security benefits such as PhilHealth, Social Security, and Pag-IBIG Fund to avail housing loans; but as what Mr. Bismonte experienced- that of earning 700 pesos if he earns a 4,000 daily quota, or even lower, isn’t it that a sham? He was promised to be given benefits as stated above, yet still gained none, is the consolidation under the modernisation program really benefited the drivers who at first self-employed to begin with?
that sham consolidation and pretentious modernisation doesn’t suffice the problem regarding mass transport what more that of the driver's woes. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">It is not surprising that its supporters talk about sacrifice and the need for contentment but until when drivers had to endure a meagre pay in the face of rising standards of living? That’s bullshit! The profiteers especially bureaucrats reap their profits in that venture called “modernisation” at the expense of the needy driver and commuter! And now that the drivers, operators, assemblers, and even commuters starting to complain and protest about the “modernisation” problem these apologists cry about the environment, “destabilisation”, “terrorism”, or whatsoever just to undermine the just calls for resolving problems related to the program itself- especially with the bogus, anti-driver plan to “modernize” transportation, hundreds of thousands of jeepney drivers and operators will risk losing their source of income and livelihood. </div><div style="text-align: justify;">How much that modern jeepney? More than a million as these are imported from China or Korea/or assembled in the Philippines using imported parts? And yet the driver can't earn better despite reaching a boundary? Most traditional jeepney drivers able to recondition their trusty vehicles to become "workable" and if necessary buy new but affordable from local assemblers. The latter, also affected by that "modernisation" demanded inclusion in the need for improving yet those pretentious "modernisers" rather sided with the importers offering overpriced "modern jeepneys" mostly minibuses! Cooperatives? Is there any fairness in sharing profits like Mr. Bismonte taking home only P700 despite earning a daily quota of 4000? True that Profit-sharing here is not an end in itself, but simply a means for carrying out the cooperative ideal, or maybe that "cooperative" serve as a front for profiteers pretending to be supportive of the driver and the commuter? </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Again, the transport sector questions the program if not asserts the need for an inclusive, sustainable, and better alternative to what profiteers insisted- for the fact that the consolidation under this "modernisation" program is itself an intrusion on public demands for efficient and sustainable mass transport by entrenched interests. </div><div><br /></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-78564552826321834002023-12-30T09:35:00.000-08:002024-01-11T12:07:13.033-08:00New Year, Same Problems, New Challenges, New Hope<p style="text-align: center;"><b>New Year, Same Problems, <br /></b><b>New Challenges, New Hope</b></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Warm, patriotic greetings. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> This note bid greetings in this start of a new year. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"> For the fact that this 2024 will be as same as that of last and past years, expect same problems to address and new challenges to face with. However, this note also wishes for everyone’s freedom and pursuit of happiness, as well as success in its courageous struggle for the independence of a land that’s called home.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"> How come this note said so- of facing same problems and new challenges this 2024? In a country that’s in a still-continuing past would say that existing problems trumps the establishment’s presentation- that even those who thought there will be changes realised they themselves being mislead- landlessness remains an issue, so is low wages, unjust working conditions, high cost of living, corruption, and vassalage to overlords.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Quite true enough knowing that these problems hinder a nation’s development the way rice hoarders creating artificial scarcity in the middle of a rice crisis. People worked hard to improve their standard of living, but to see the realities of exploitation, mismanagement, and injustice finds messages from the government remain as motherhood statements, if not hyperboles. True enough to call Filipinos to contribute to the future of the country, embody the spirit of solidarity through acts of kindness, volunteerism, and compassion, so is to seek truth from facts and to assert just calls, if not push actions to counter societal ills and promote true social justice and lasting peace. </p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"> But regardless of these there’s hope in a nation that’s promising to have a place in the sun. As any other year, people, in carrying such hopes and aspirations, should plough, worke, learn, build and fight for a nation in fulfill such dreams of a just and progressive society. </span></p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-42415239315859080162023-12-29T06:41:00.000-08:002024-01-04T08:42:40.334-08:00Drivers, Operators, Assemblers, Commuters, Unite! Defy the Ban!<p></p><div style="text-align: center;"><b> Drivers, Operators, Assemblers, Commuters, Unite! Defy the Ban!</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b><br /></b></div><br /><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">This note expresses support for the struggling Jeepney drivers and operators in its recent transport strike.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">For contrary to the establishment's view that the transport strike as a "painful interference in the efforts to provide solutions to the problems" the solutions such as forced consolidation and buying overpriced "modern jeepneys"- vehicles that could cost up to P2.8 million each doesn't offset the transportation crisis. The fact that only large corporations with single consolidated franchises have the financial means to purchase and fully comply with the current PUV Modernisation Program (PUVMP) schemes actually aggravates the situation, as it robs operators of their rights and privileges as individual franchise holders. To make matters worse, supporters of so-called "modernisation" constantly harp on about the environment, traffic congestion, and even aesthetics. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">And, despite the establishment's efforts to downplay the situation, this and the coming year's action shows that the plan to phase out using terms like "consolidation", "modernisation", or even the use of "cooperatives" as alibis affects not only the drivers, operators, and assemblers, but also the general public, especially since the deadline imposed to consolidate under the modernization program will only worsen the country's crisis. Who's bullshit to agree that idea other than the profiteers and self-proclaimed "edgy" individuals? Yes, the lives of millions of commuters, drivers, operators, and their families are in the hands of an order that prioritizes its own interests.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">True enough that the mass transport system is in serious need of modernisation, but should it be at the expense of the drivers and operators themselves? It's easier to talk about the need for sacrifice yet the fact that these folks worked hard only for a measly income faced a situation that's contrary to their aspiration for a better life then what kind of "modernisation" the establishment is talking about? Forcing them, mostly having an income that can't reach some hundred thousands to buy a "modern" jeepney that costs a million from an importer? What more to see "modern" jeepneys deteriorating after several months or a year? And in speaking of "cooperatives" how come there are bigwigs able to gain rights for PUV franchise at the expense of smalltime operators? Again is this the consolidation and modernisation being talked about? </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Still, "Political" no matter what</p><p style="text-align: justify;">For sure there are those who will cry out loud for seeing the situation as becoming political than an issue based matter, but they forgot that these folks had to plea on politicians first to stop that forced consolidation and address first the issues surrounding that modernisation attempt, but entrenched interests would try to muddle down the thought that the calls from these affected sectors are itself political. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Furthermore, despite the establishment's attempts to minimize the situation, it doesn't hide the fact that the phase out cannot resolve the problem of mass transport. Who's got to buy an expensive "modern jeepney" that's a refurbished bus or multicab from China? It costs higher than those assembled at home with the better if not the best quality required possible. Yes, it is political no matter what apologists trying to downplay, calling protesters destabilisers or terrorists if they want, for the fact that the protest actions taken this year and in the upcoming year shows that the plan to phase out really affects all people, not just drivers, operators, and even assemblers willing to offer sound and inclusive alternatives to that goddamned "modernisation". <br /><br />Again, call it Politically-laced their calls and actions, but given that the country's crisis the attempt to downplay alongside this sham "development to modernise public transport" will only get worse especially with the inconsiderable and unjustly imposed deadline for consolidating under the modernization program nor intentionally failing to heed the woes of affected sectors. Most legislators chose to be "yes-men" of the administration that's feigning ignorant, if not pretending to be concerned as one legislator would say "the need for a just transition" while "cannot just ignore the sacrifice of the majority of the public transportation sector." Obviously, these "yes men" in the legislature are willing to sacrifice these drivers and operators, forcing them to buy a "modern jeep" that costs more than millions! Indeed, the establishment, with its focus on its own interests, controls the lives of millions of drivers, operators, and commuters as well as their families.</p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-51848182764448217622023-12-26T01:21:00.000-08:002024-01-04T08:43:32.331-08:00The flames still burning, so is the people’s desire for redemption and justice<p style="text-align: center;"><b>The flames still burning, <br />so is the people’s desire for redemption and justice</b></p><p style="text-align: center;"><br /></p><div style="text-align: justify;">Despite assurances of renewing peace, the current order is still at present in its most aggressive advances against the masses. In a period that communities still trying to recover from the pandemic, recent news such as low wages, rising costs of commodities, agrarian crisis, the recent jeepney phase-out, to that of still-subservience to foreign interests, the current order still tries to snare the nation through its unbridled demagogy and its shrieking of phrases such as "unity", "development", "national interest", all to win over the middle class and the working masses, including students and women, as well as groups of backward, unenlightened workers and peasants. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">For like 2016 and 2022, the current order, being desperate in its consolidation due to recent internal rifts, will "try its best" to suppress the still-growing opposition in the name of "counterinsurgency" alongside participation in capitalist rationalisation, and complete capitulation before today's imperialism, and thus prepared the ground for another wave of Marcosian/Dutertist demagoguery.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Like its predecessors, the "patriotism" being bannered is but half-baked if not sham. It's rhetoric, being centered on "national unity" fails to cover up the fact that the internal rifts been shown out, whilst economic and social policies remain favourable to entrenched interests at the expense of the working masses. Yes, the neoliberal-globalist policies being bannered by those appearing to be "patriots" in fact passing all its burdens to the working people. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">How come? Did these apologists talked about sovereignty? Sovereignty doesn't limit to that of defending the islands, shoals, and the sea as what they've presented, but also that of asserting and realising the hopes and aspirations of the people. Marcos jr., in his 2023 New Year's message said that "The innate bayanihan spirit in all of us is what will keep us going amidst all adversities that will continue to test our fortitude as a nation," yet is it? The interest seekers continue to exploit while pretending to be "in solidarity" with the people as they favour policies like privatisation, deregulation, and the likes. Wouldn't be surprised if they've sold off the belongings, life, and existence of the working people to the highest-bidding foreign imperialists especially that of United States and China while bannering the Philippine flag and talking about "national unity to overcome adversities."</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">To be frank, such scenarios showeth that in the midst of global crisis brought by today’s capitalist system, that monopoly capitalism and imperialism still continues to engage in ever-worsening forms of oppression and exploitation in every folk and community to maximise profits. Contrary to the presentations peddled by capitalists- that of a "better future" under theirs obviously doesn't realise in both "developed" and "underdeveloped" societies. The latter, mainly semicolonial/semifeudal in nature continues to aggravate existing tensions as it engenders worsening socioeconomic conditions for the majority of workers, peasants, and toiling masses. Those who resist are being averted by the attack dogs of the system as local vassals, backed by monopoly capitalists, incite wars and other violent confrontations to maintain control over their interests. However, the increasing levels of social instability and worker and other laborer resistance are not stopped by such "preemptive measures." The semicolonial and semifeudal system in the Philippines are in a hopeless situation, and things will only get worse while the global capitalist system continues to wriggle through its problems, creating conditions that are driving an increasing number of people to wage revolutionary resistance in order to realize their dreams of a democratic nation and to struggle militantly and collectively for their political and economic rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Regardless of their actions from the system, it becomes imperative that in seeking truth from facts means to expose, oppose those whose subservience to entrenched interests and exploiters of working masses, and to assert forward national and social alternative to this ever-continuing crisis. People have enough that through neoliberal capitalism, International high finance has taken command of the sovereign rights of the Filipino people and is now exploiting even further with agreements both current and new- as recent news like private control of airports and railways to that of wanting multinationals, like its local “oligarch” partners to control agriculture as that of manufacturing, is this the “progress” and “development” being presented to the people last elections? And if its attack dogs trying to maim those who truly concerned and therefore willing to oppose then is it wrong in calling for resistance? </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: left;"> As realities made the Filipino folk as if deserved to have chains of slavery made from gold and made from its own tears, sweat and blood, then those truly concerned about the country would agree what Mao Zedong said “it is right to rebel” and therefore it becomes imperative to fight by various forms and means to assert a just alternative to an enforced crisis. Until when people realise that the current administration is as same as that of its predecessors? Is their “unity” worth unifying as familiar despotic faces and same unjust policies prevail? Quite agreeable the words of Unity, Solidarity, Change, Nationalism, but not of their shallow interpretation- for the fact that theirs being presented to this and future generations is dismissable as some legal fiction, moot and academic in favour of their continuous vassalage to foreign overlords and entrenched interests.</span></div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-80435555188462296012023-12-25T02:44:00.000-08:002023-12-25T02:44:41.631-08:00PEACE with JUSTICE: A dream this Christmas and New Year <div style="text-align: center;"><b>PEACE with JUSTICE:</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>A dream this Christmas and New Year </b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"> by Kat Ulrike </div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> At first, this note expressed greetings to the folk in this season of giving, sharing, love, and solidarity. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> For this note, as any other notes this Christmas and this coming new year, expresses the hopes and aspirations of many- especially that of a Just and Lasting Peace, amidst silent wars and of organised conflicts. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Call it politically laced in this season, but as inconvenient realities continue to prevail, this occasion- that of Christ's birth, carries the message of Christ himself- that of redemption, and in redemption also includes solidarity with the oppressed and the disenfranchised. For sure everyone has remembered the Magnificat, and from its message- that of awaiting a saviour, has made each and every concerned carry the task of not just clinging to the faith but also to fight. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Lastly, this note believes that in this coming year expect same old situations and continuing battles. True that in wishing for both Justice and Peace means an assertion of just calls despite numerous challenges and risks. Thus, this note also believes that 2024 will prove to be a year of struggle, that as everyone strives for the better, expect numerous sacrifices and thus taking chances to rededicate to breaking shackles and advance forward the hopes of many for all time.
</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-69954384949211918222023-12-24T23:41:00.000-08:002023-12-25T01:06:34.022-08:00"Yuletide Greetings."<div style="text-align: center;"><b>"Yuletide Greetings."</b></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Warm, patriotic greetings. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgc_vUm9o968jatXbcNRgDGLqn0Ri7KYjFI5Cy9CmUHqySa5PpJOWLANeyJz_3GhFIJ7PGV7xgWWsMy9e6XSGm2hj_2d_662jCoAm1Cfl01TJkojIqZ6GeO2XUyfSn2poYxh8cH_ztp9nKLkFe0xgwmjjw7tJo4NnvAFjCqKL5MIldi81wL2FrOIUs6xI/s1248/IMG_0036.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1248" data-original-width="768" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgc_vUm9o968jatXbcNRgDGLqn0Ri7KYjFI5Cy9CmUHqySa5PpJOWLANeyJz_3GhFIJ7PGV7xgWWsMy9e6XSGm2hj_2d_662jCoAm1Cfl01TJkojIqZ6GeO2XUyfSn2poYxh8cH_ztp9nKLkFe0xgwmjjw7tJo4NnvAFjCqKL5MIldi81wL2FrOIUs6xI/s320/IMG_0036.jpeg" width="197" /></a></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Initially, this message brought pleasant tidings to the people throughout the Yuletide season. Because, as the year comes to a close, this note encourages everyone to gather on this solemn occasion. This message extends its sincerest Yuletide greetings to everyone during this season of reflection, love, and togetherness. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">For Yuletide, or should say, Christmas is more than just a celebration; it is also a reaffirmation of hope and love among individuals and communities. Let everyone remember Christmas as a season of righteousness and justice, as Christ, the son of God, has promised salvation and a call to action in everyone. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Especially at a time when the current system is straining to seem "united" while failing to uplift its own people, let alone pay its debts and boast about "development." In a recent message, its standard bearer reminded everyone that "the true meaning of Christmas lies in the recognition of the season as an opportunity to reach out to those who are suffering from solitude, sickness, and poverty," and yet the crisis persists as the same order fails to heed the basic calls of the people--that of socioeconomic justice and adherence to human rights--while boasting to the rest of the world that "development" continues as it benefits the people- only to found out it benefited the “haves” at the expense of the “have nots.” </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">But regardless of their acts, those who are concerned finds in their latest reports uncovering of “disunity” and “continuing repression and injustice” a validation of its call that the people must learn, work, and struggle for their freedom and prosperity in their homes and communities. True that the desire for peace is a shared call, but for the truly concerned, the desire for peace alone is not enough as the order itself treats “peace” as just that of silence and society’s acquiescence to their interests. People desired peace with justice, and continual measures would ensure that this appeal was answered. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Finally, let this note regard this occasion as a symbolic gateway to the sublime, an opportunity to reconnect with the timeless principles that guide and elevate minds and souls. As everyone gathers with loved ones this season, may they reflect on the wisdom that exists behind the traditions that they continue to adore. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">And like the Christmas candles being lighted for Christ’s birth, may the flame of every shared endeavor burn ever brighter, illuminating the path for all who seek the peace of the eternal in this age of dissolution. May this season bring all of us freedom, justice, unity, peace, and prosperity.
</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-36059051830437556052023-12-15T15:41:00.000-08:002023-12-16T17:39:15.098-08:00“He may be gone”<div style="text-align: center;"><b>“He may be gone”</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">He may be gone </div><div style="text-align: center;">But as the fire burns strong </div><div style="text-align: center;">One after another will carry its flames along </div><div style="text-align: center;">The thought remains </div><div style="text-align: center;">As generation browses the pages </div><div style="text-align: center;">Trying to end the catastrophe </div><div style="text-align: center;">If not to resolve the crisis </div><div style="text-align: center;">Bringing hopes to fulfill </div><div style="text-align: center;">As they’ll turn the history’s wheel </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">He may be gone</div><div style="text-align: center;">Yet his name continues to resound</div><div style="text-align: center;">Praised, remembered, even still slandered</div><div style="text-align: center;">By friends, folks, and the order still feared</div><div style="text-align: center;">About his persona to that of his works</div><div style="text-align: center;">Of his poems, essays, and expressions</div><div style="text-align: center;">All based from the hardships of the masses</div><div style="text-align: center;">And basis to strike the order and its attack dogs</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">For the order remains the same </div><div style="text-align: center;">With all its obvious intentions </div><div style="text-align: center;">Despite different names </div><div style="text-align: center;">And rephrased delusions </div><div style="text-align: center;">The fields remained stained with blood </div><div style="text-align: center;">No matter the order showcases its edifices </div><div style="text-align: center;">Trying to stop those who awake and assert </div><div style="text-align: center;">Just because of an endless unresolved situations </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Expect insults and slander </div><div style="text-align: center;">From the order and hired detractors </div><div style="text-align: center;">Trying “bests” to subvert the truth </div><div style="text-align: center;">In favour of the order and its “beauteous” filth </div><div style="text-align: center;">The news to social media trying to churn lies </div><div style="text-align: center;">Yet failing to appease the folk as they realise </div><div style="text-align: center;">Yes, they claim he and others as failure </div><div style="text-align: center;">Yet the order failed to end the struggle </div><div style="text-align: center;">As the flames continue to burn seeing in every station </div><div style="text-align: center;">And the order turning catastrophic situations into conditions for a revolution
</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">Again, just like his colleagues, he may be gone</div><div style="text-align: center;">But like his works that passed on to generations</div><div style="text-align: center;">His legacy remains forever. </div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-64172252635326105782023-12-09T20:04:00.000-08:002023-12-26T22:29:05.758-08:00Human Rights, Social justice, must prevail!<div style="text-align: center;"><b>Human Rights, Social justice, must prevail!</b></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">This note extends solidarity in commemorating the 75th year of the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With the theme “Freedom, Equality, and Justice for All”, this declaration since the adoption in 1948 enshrines the inalienable rights of the people regardless of race, gender, religion, or creed- and thus is must recognise, adhere, and consider as an important reference in the defense of rights and welfare of the Filipino folk amidst the ever-continuing crisis and the prevailing oppression in the name of order.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> In marking this commemoration, it is a duty of the folk to guard the rights of its fellow, and that includes to put a spotlight on the grave situation of human rights in the country under the current administration- for like its predecessor, people’s rights are still trampled be it in the name of “counterinsurgency”, especially in the provinces. For sure its apologists would even justify further such as “industrial peace”, “deterrence to crime”, “discipline” among others even it meant repression. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Indeed, for according to recent data, 127,000 Filipinos have been violated in 957 cases involving state components, including 79 cases of Extra-Judicial deaths, 87 cases of abductions, 28 cases of frustrated murder, 155 cases of arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, and 44 cases of torture. The majority of victims of governmental violence are peasants, farmworkers, and members of national minorities. Furthermore, there are approximately 800 political prisoners demanding freedom and justice for their beliefs, notably those concerning social justice. Again, state elements, acting as the order's attack dogs, fraudulently identify them as insurgents in order to cover up the crime and establish a culture of impunity.
<br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Such actions from these attack dogs would say fail to stem the growing concern and awareness from the people. Despite ever churning of propaganda and slander, the concerned masses continue to assert just calls such as to defend their land against land grabbing, ancestral domains against encroachment of development aggressors, the right for fair wages, just working conditions, even press freedom and the right to express, seeking truth from facts in a time orderists and its apologists trying to undermine using various reasons and actions even it requires spending hundreds of billions of pesos worth of weapons trying to subjugate people and communities.
Such actions shows the ever consolidating moves to preserve the rotting social order. Regardless of its “developmentalist”, “modernizing” appearance, being an appendage of exploiters exposes how this system is rotten to the core- as despotic landlords, corrupt bureaucrats, together with foreign overlords United States and China willing to violate people’s rights in various forms all “in the name of order and stability.” </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;">The Filipino people must once more raise their voices in favor of justice, peace, and holding those who abuse people's rights responsible for their actions. Those who are genuinely concerned should reaffirm their dedication to the timeless principles of this Universal Declaration of Human Rights in addition to the assertion of a just, progressive society in the face of red-tagging, harassment, and attempts to thwart people's hopes and aspirations.</div>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-13579609245786133582023-11-30T02:22:00.000-08:002023-12-02T02:30:36.319-08:00 “Technofeudalism”: Capitalism – and then?<p style="text-align: center;"><b> “Technofeudalism”: Capitalism – and then?</b></p><p></p><div style="text-align: center;">Michael Bröning<br /><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">from Vörwarts, November 30, 2023</div><p></p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyTfiXPgJBBMVKmCc9ALI8z0o4-fVVm2pcX415hHk_inQbQqdYdfvt0awDahc82wjONilEcyLlt-pyMd-XxHG31UAqQXM-w6wc7lqR8-juv_-lg3dXq57C9cOGqiCNo3QVAJ196coF0TiLB7UxplQUh62C0r1iwM4DCXb2K6Gh-T5fxDmp76BZ2dbURWc/s400/_2adhnZs_400x400.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="400" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyTfiXPgJBBMVKmCc9ALI8z0o4-fVVm2pcX415hHk_inQbQqdYdfvt0awDahc82wjONilEcyLlt-pyMd-XxHG31UAqQXM-w6wc7lqR8-juv_-lg3dXq57C9cOGqiCNo3QVAJ196coF0TiLB7UxplQUh62C0r1iwM4DCXb2K6Gh-T5fxDmp76BZ2dbURWc/w203-h203/_2adhnZs_400x400.jpg" width="203" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Yanis Varoufakis </span></td></tr></tbody></table>Honest hero or nuisance? In his sixth book “Technofeudalism,” former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis warns against Big Tech. His analysis is frightening. Some of his proposed solutions are too.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Depending on your perspective, Yanis Varoufakis is either an intrepid hero who stood up to the EU's austerity policy as Greek finance minister - or "the biggest pain in the ass in the room," as the Financial Times once declared. A minister without a tie? With a motorcycle? Unheard of, said former Federal Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble at the height of the crisis.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Varoufakis was unexpectedly swept from the university ivory tower to the top of Greek politics in the wake of the euro crisis. There he played the role of his life alongside Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras in the summer of 2015: here Tsipras, who ultimately bowed to European guidelines, there the tirelessly fighting Yanis - Don Quixote - Varoufakis. He was celebrated, not least in the German media, as the “ Greek Minister of Awesome ”.<br /><br /><br />A fictional dialogue with the deceased father</p><p style="text-align: justify;">His sixth book is now also being celebrated: “Technofeudalism. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">“What killed capitalism.” In it, Varoufakis, who describes himself as a libertarian Marxist, describes the catastrophic effects of the digital economy. Conceived as a follow-up to his bestseller “Time for Change: How I Explain the Economy to My Daughter,” the work is a fictional dialogue between Varoufakis and his late father: a lovingly drawn dissident, communist activist and – long live the contradiction! – senior employees of a steel company.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The book begins with a memory: At the evening fireplace, Varoufakis senior explains to his young son not only the adaptability of metals, but also that of the capitalist system using metallurgical experiments. Years later, the young Varoufakis installed his father's first internet-enabled computer. Impressed by the technology, he asks: “Now that computers are talking to each other, is capitalism about to be overcome or ruled forever?” The book is a belated answer to this “killer question”.<br /><br /><br />Greek mythology and pop culture counterpoints</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Varoufakis is concerned with moral integration into the larger humanistic whole. The book repeatedly references Greek mythology and pop culture counterpoints. This creates an arc of tension between Prometheus and Minotaur on the one hand and the cynical manipulations of the New York “Mad Men” on the other.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The initial analytical thesis is: Capitalism is not dying, it has been dead for a long time. The perpetrator? Capitalism itself. Or rather a viral mutation that caused the pillars of the system to collapse. Markets and profit are history. “Capital still exists,” says Varoufakis, “but capitalism does not.”<br /><br /><br />Small-scale digital cloud principalities</p><p style="text-align: justify;">At first glance, what Varoufakis himself admits seems unconvincing. Isn't capitalism everywhere? But what looks like capitalism and free markets is now something fundamentally different, argues Varoufakis. The titans of the digital economy and Big Tech have now transformed the already perverted hyper-capitalism into a far more sinister system. “The good old, bad days” became “techno-feudalism” through cheap money and huge amounts of state financial flows.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The world is disintegrating into digital cloud principalities, which resemble hierarchical fiefdom pyramids, analogous to the feudal order of the Middle Ages. In this new constellation, even the largest traditional capitalist individual companies only play the role of vassals in the middle ranks, serving the manipulations emanating from the top through conventional production.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The majority of people in this system populate the basement floors. The “Prols” lead a desolate existence in the engine rooms like in HG Wells’ “Time Machine”. Supervised by algorithms, they are trapped in the limbo of the Amazon warehouses. They perform the modern equivalent of feudal forced labor.<br /><br /><br />Users held hostage</p><p style="text-align: justify;">And the rest? Precariously dependent people who fuel the system by providing their own digital identities. Like a maelstrom, every click travels free of charge to the all-knowing cloud. “The real revolution is the transformation of billions of people into willing slaves,” says Varoufakis.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">People become the raw material of an exploitation scheme that simultaneously devours and despises them. Refusal is impossible. Because we have all been hopelessly digitally entangled for a long time. “The companies know that they can treat us users however they please. “When was the last time someone rejected the terms of a software update?” asks Varoufakis. Ultimately, the users are held hostage: “Our contacts, friends, chat histories, pictures… We lose everything if we turn away,” says Varoufakis.<br /><br /><br />Memories of Orwell's "1984"</p><p style="text-align: justify;">At the top, however, there is a distant class of neo-feudal paladins with untold wealth. According to Varoufakis, this class can no longer be reached through conventional attempts at political containment. Because unlike the captains of industry at the beginning of the 20th century, the rulers of the cloud today are becoming fabulously rich “without organizing the production of any specific product”. Their power is no longer based on tangible things, on monopolies or on unfair production conditions. In seemingly free markets, they orchestrate not only the production, presentation and transaction but also the all-encompassing management of consciousness. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">The development is global: split into power blocs of American and Chinese provenance – with all the associated risks of military escalation. The feudal blocs remind Varoufakis of the “continental superstates in George Orwell’s 1984.”<br /><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Vision of a post-post-capitalist Bullerbüs</p><p style="text-align: justify;">But what can be done about the undesirable development described so vividly? Here Varoufakis remains vague and that is the weakness of the otherwise worthwhile book. In fact, his argument falls into two parts. The first two-thirds provide an excellent analysis of the faults. The last third, however, outlines a counterproposal. And this vision – and the path to it – if actually implemented, would hardly be less frightening than the disastrous initial situation described itself.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">A utopia is designed that is reminiscent of Marx's “German ideology”. Hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon and criticize after dinner? Fast: In Varoufakis' vision, life oscillates between morning coffee, a jointly curated community newsletter and working in an anarcho-syndical company. So far, so idyllic.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">In a kind of post-post-capitalist Bullerbü, decisions are made by unelected councils. “The tyranny of land ownership” has been overcome. Private property was largely abolished. A global unit of account (“the cosmos”) equalizes development differences between the global north and south, companies are handed over to the general public and decisions in the workplace are made by digital tribunals.<br /><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">“Cloud slaves of all countries, unite!”</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The path into this world remains vague. The only thing that is clear to Varoufakis is that social democratic attempts at regulation are impossible. The center left is “morally effeminate and complicit” in the existential threat. All that remains is networking, rebellion and revolution. However, Varoufakis lacks any proof that the path to his utopia would be different from the previous bloody Marxist attempts at redemption. He repeatedly praises the achievements of the Soviet Union - without, of course, sweeping the authoritarian excesses under the table.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The work ends pathetically with the call of the Communist Manifesto: “Cloud slaves of all countries, unite!” But this is either a purely aesthetic revolutionary pose or a very adventurous agitation. Honest hero or nuisance? In his latest book, Varoufakis remains both at the same time. But you should definitely read it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Yanis Varoufakis: Technofeudalism. What killed Capitalism, Vintage, 2023, 281 pages</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /><br /></p><div style="text-align: center;">***</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-align: center;">Michael Bröning is a writer for V</span><span style="text-align: center;">ö</span><span style="text-align: center;">rwarts. T</span>he article is roughly translated from its German original. </div><p></p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6304812203344171831.post-46588278211148582672023-11-29T12:06:00.000-08:002023-12-02T12:10:35.937-08:00 To be like Bonifacio means to continue the Resistance<p style="text-align: center;"><b> To be like Bonifacio means to continue the Resistance</b></p><p style="text-align: center;">Kat Ulrike<br /><br /><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">To begin, this note extends greetings to the Filipino people on the occasion of Andres Bonifacio's 160th birth anniversary, whose valor and love for the people has inspired generations against local tyranny and foreign colonial persecution. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">After centuries of local despotism and foreign semicolonial domination in the Philippines, the Filipino people are still inspired by the teachings of Filipino patriots like Bonifacio, from whom comes renewed resistance to colonial oppression. </p><p></p><div style="text-align: justify;">True, that current President Marcos Jr. has urged Filipinos to emulate Bonifacio's bravery. In fact, it is now more important than ever to draw strength and lessons from patriots such as Bonifacio, Rizal, and others whose patriotism has fanned the flames of resistance against injustice, emphasizing the importance and urgency of fighting for national and social liberation at a time when local tryants oppressed the folk with unjust laws and actions, and foreign overlords such as the United States and China have meddled domestic affairs and stunted national development. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Looking back at history</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Inspired by the works of Jose Rizal and the French Revolution, Bonifacio admired the ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity, which translated into the local perspective and motivated the toiling masses to rally behind the banner of national liberation under the Katipunan. The void left by the Insulares like Andres Novales and "El Conde Filipino" Varela was eventually filled by Mestizos and Indios who eventually joined under one banner and one resistance as Filipinos. And through covert means of organization, the Katipunan led a force of several tens of thousands of people that swept from Manila (including Rizal), to Cavite, Batangas, Laguna, Bulacan, Tayabas, Nueva Ecija, the provinces of Pangasinan and Ilocos, the Bicol region of Luzon, the provinces of Aklan and Cebu in the Visayas, and the provinces of Bukidnon and Misamis in Mindanao. People, primarily from the working masses, joined the cause, particularly after the Cry of Pugad Lawin and Rizal's execution in Bagumbayan, which made it clear that an armed revolution was required to end the Spanish colonial power in the Philippines.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">However, despite successes, this was not enough to fend off the shortcomings, as well as maneuvers and political attacks of those who ought to take away the leadership of the Philippine revolution in the Tejeros Convention, murder Bonifacio in Mt. Buntis, and the surrender at Biak-na-Bato regardless of opposition by members of the Katipunan like Malvar and Paciano Rizal, believing it was a ruse of the Spaniards to get rid of the Revolution easily. </p><p></p><div style="text-align: justify;">Those who stood by Bonifacio after his death either lay low and returning to their homes, or continued fighting despite refusing to join the forces of General Emilio Aguinaldo. Katipuneros Emilio Jacinto died fighting against Spainiards despite having Malaria in Laguna, while Macario Sakay was being branded as a "bandit" and executed by the Americans for being true to his nationalist cause. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The flames kept burning</p><p style="text-align: justify;">On the other hand, this note one would understand the otherwise inexplicable mistakes and shortcomings of men like Duterte, Marcos jr. and others whose clamour for "unity" and "change" is but meaningless terms meant to snare hopeless folks. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">For contrary to their statements, their actions speak much of continuity that rather benefited the status quo, that development that's being bragged has benefited the "haves" and not the "have nots" regardless of the latter's efforts. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">True that Marcos wanted the people to emulate Bonifacio and his nationalism the way his predecessor Duterte calls on the public to get involved in community and national issues that affect everyone's lives; yet to see a country remain an appendage of both American and Chinese overlords, of having unequal agreements and unjust policies that benefited local tyrants, this continuity of injustice and disenfranchisement has turned the message into an empty rhetoric if not mocking the folk as it engages in a resistance in various forms. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Why the protest marches? Why the stirring speeches against the rotten social order? Why taking up arms in various forms? Why the need for sacrifice? For sure people would say that Bonifacio's message and that of other patriots is relegated to history and therefore must "move on" from it in favour of a neoliberal setting that is today with its illusion of progress and development, but again, the existing poverty, injustice, oppression under the current social order has turned those who are truly concerned into what they perceive as subversive as they express their national and social aspiration. The struggle for independence doesn't stop with the abrogation of the unequal agreements, executing tyrants, or by seeing the flag flying alone, but also to having a land to till, a living wage and a right to livelihood, food, education and health, a decent life as what Bonifacio and the Katipunan envisioned. </p>Iskrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08868077344603088408noreply@blogger.com