Darkness remains, Freedom in flames

Darkness remains

Freedom in flames

As this person observed, attachments to anything the system has offered, particularly those from its "state of the art" foreign master will find the desire to break free from the old order impossible for todays people.

Ranging from infrastructure to modern goods in nice packages, the system has trying to make everyone blind, deaf, and mute from the realities the system has badly done to its constituents. And for today's people, increasingly consumerist in character, rather cannot "bite the hands" that has been feeding their minds with various forms of fantasies. The system, however, is trying to cling as possible by means of adapting and modifying change into something that emphasises much of its own interests. 

That sometimes it may described as "reform" or even "revolution from above" for as the system "remolds" and "modernises" while keeping firm in its age old exploitative "traditions" rooted in interests; but to think that the system's character has nothing to do with the aspirations of the people except to exploit, of what are these remoldings then? The system's intention to "change" is to keep in its own interests ranging from adapting modern methods to parroting patriotic sentiment in case of what people currently expressed.

Quite strange to think that the intention to make "change" in pursuit of keeping firm in its interest doesn't even pave way to upliftment, particularly to the labouring people. For the system can't provide "truly and really serious" support for 11.1 million unemployed (or underemployed) masses and 1.2 million farmers having tenancy agreements. Of having "really existing" low wages (2-5%) regardless of rising productivity rates (26%) with 66 million relied on 125 pesos per day, and 67.2 % admitted being poor regardless of the system afforded to say a growing economy and a developed society. Hence, likely to describe that word "Change" as all but rhetorical for the system via its press releases if not "justified" by a series of half-hearted projects, that are obviously attempts meant to "appease" the clamouring people be it those having gadgets (yet burdened with higher taxes) to those working overtime for enough wages (yet burdened with higher prices). 

But whatever the system tries to assert their statements, the people's expression is more than just flag waving sentiment or a praising of old and new heroes clamouring for freedom alone, but also a clamour for real development that is based on the people's demand, be it justice, peace, land, and bread. It may deemed age-old for it was clamoured in the past, yet knowing that the present system has shrugged the people's demand and at the same time sensing a growing poverty and discontent, of what is change if it is not for the people? Remember: China has been threatening its neighbours particularly in the disputed islands including the Philippines, while the United States has been brewing conflicts in the middle east as well as in the Philippines itself through the present system; the neighbouring countries in southeast Asia has trying its best to stand up on its own with all the knowledge they inherit or acquired being used to practise their self-reliance and devlopment; but how about the Philippines? 

Well, based on observations, it is "natural" for the Filipinos to run towards Uncle Sam to fight against Fu Manchu, and tell the world that the country as weak and incapable of fighting against a stronger foe, calling for help from its neighbours whom likely to have half-hearted statements as they're also trying to keep their own national interests; but come to think of this: since the Filipinos also afforded to take pride in its struggle with its heroes like Rizal, Bonifacio, and Antonio Luna, of being industrious in the eyes of the west and east, and even babbling about self-reliance in case of the armed forces, then how about start making serious in its struggle for existence, of asserting the demand for national independence through self reliance than relying to a sly entity that has been assuming both as a savior and a rapist? There are less factories yet more commercial establishments controlled by the compradores; there are even more farmlands yet its peasants remained chained to its feudal pasts; several attempts for development coming from patriotic-minded individuals has been diluted, reduced to rhetorics, if not trashed altogether by the system whose perspective emphasised keeping firm in its compradore-feudal interests; and for decades the Philippines has not escaped from its indebtedness caused by loans from moneylenders like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, so is the decades-old benevolent assimilation whose legacy is a generation of Filipinos whose minds failed to break free from the dictates of the United States. Quite inconvenient though to read this post, knowing that Philippines, although situated in a southeast Pacific side of Eurasia, has not yet left from its Atlanticist "character" like any other repressed tributary self proclaimed as the free world.

Again, thanks to that benevolent assimilation that has created a generation of dependents and vassals to a developed superpower. The system benefited so much that they rather let multinationals and its own vassals exploit resources and labour for export as well as letting cheap imports take over every market, crippling local establishments and threatening jobs; than protecting its own enterprises, undertaking agrarian reform, undertaking a serious social welfare program, and urging everyone to roll their own sleeves and set new foundations of a developed state. Although it is appreciative to see contributions and benevolence coming from once colonisers be it those of Spain and the United States, its negative effects continues to linger with everyone yearning for social justice and self determination. "Plough, Work, Build the Nation, work and learn as ever yet" as one passage says to having a nation that is truly independent. But no! What people may ought to describe the present situation under the decadent dilapidated system is that "darkeness remains, freedom in flames."

Admittingly speaking, in seeing a renewed sense of patriotism, especially after watching movies like "Heneral Luna" and other related works, somehow lies a clamour for breaking free from its dependent past. It may take years, decades, even centuries with the system trying its "best" to negate that idea and reduce into a mere legacy like any other textbook summary only few ought to understand. Yes, true that the country has been weak for years up till the present, failing to confront bigger enemies and crying for outside help like everybody sees of it; but what makes it weak if not having a system being dependent from a so-called superpower, obedient to a retroactive policy, and repressive to those who are asserting national independence, dignity, peace, justice, land, and bread? Well, for sure everyone hears about terms like "unfinished revolution", "social volcano", "revolt of the poor", calling for a "moral recovery", upholding a "righteous path", anything populistic yet those who afforded to speak are also scared on those words as people, sick and tired of repression and crisis has been awaken and willing to make fire as possible! The system has been trying to put things under control from its own armed thugs to social media, from online trolls harassing the aware to prison cells full of those committed to the stuggle. Yes, that system who has afforded to talk about "blood and honour," "soil and freedom" to those of "revolt of the poor" is actually aggravating an existing issue, be it those of centuries-old feudalism, corrupt bureaucracy, a vassal of a foreign entity masquerading as a protector of the free world against its enemies.

***

Well, thanks to the book "Kasaysayan: History of the Filipino People" to feature posters made during the Japanese-Sponsored "Republic", for those works even reflect the aspirations such as a truly independent nation capable to stand up for themselves. True that darkness remains under the present order, and the people continues to rage against the dying of its own cherished light those who fought cherishedly given to them.

"One last message for this month"

"One last message for this month"

(Or a post-Heneral Luna message 

to those willing patriots of today)

This person knows that most people felt a renewed sense of patriotism especially after watching Heneral Luna.

 With all the comments, memes, quotes specifically pointing against modern day Paternos, Buencaminos, as well as culprits feigning innocence like Aguinaldo, it seems that todays people felt sense of dismay, hatred against an incompetent system repressing its own kind as well as willing to be submitted to someone else's wishes as if can guarantee "protection" or provide "development" no matter it is deemed fraudulent if not illusory as it was in the past.

This person, like those whom are concerned, knows that most people may felt dismayed if not offended for saying that the country needs to deemphasise its ties on those who exploit and repress everyone, be it the Americans, Chinese, even the system that controlled the Philippines for centuries that keeps the nation backward and dependent amidst its showcase of pride both in places, resources, and even heroes whose messages end diluted. Why offend? Is it because those countries like the United States has given bette education, development, anything that even a Filipino can make it better on its own? So much for benevolent assimilation in having a generation of mendicants yearning for economic aid and second hand trash if not series of loans that at the same time complaining as most of the national budget has been allocated to debt servicing if not in one's purse or pocket. And perhaps only few who has benefited from American-style education and culture who able to insist that the Philippines should be on its own way.

Maybe these few are like those of Luna and others who seriously adhere to preserving independence, that they are willing to give a damn just to assert the goal of breaking away from its "cherished contentments", such as keeping firm on its vested interests to the extent of giving up people's aspirations as done by his fellow Ilustrados in his time; and also willing to jump into the abyss, struggle in raging against the dying of the light the nation has carried for generations. For sure everyone has sought modern day Aguinaldos, Paternos, Buencaminos, Mascardos, and Janolinos underestimating and making hell out of today's Lunas, Sakays, Bonifacios, Nakpils, and Bernals just to keep firm in their interests. The latter needs everyone's help to so as overcome their adversaries' stupidity and assert further the aspirations that has long fought for its realisation.

Sorry for the sketch but people knows that the lunatic, the so-called "General Articulo Uno" would have expressed the vulgar expression as what everybody says (such as that dirty finger Luna's showing in that drawing), especially towards the still rotten system and the order that has been perpetuated. 

And maybe a reason enough to make hell out of them. Inconveniently true isn't it? 

That's all for now. ¡Adelante Compatriotas, Hasta la Muerte!

To the groom of death

"To the Groom of Death"

A poem Inspired by the movie Heneral Luna 

and the song "Novio de la Muerte"

All was but tragic after Kabanatuan

As you are being killed not by white-skinned foes 

But by your compatriots fueled by discontent

If not loyal by clique of traitors

Tired of seeing a "crazed lunatic" screaming out of truth and justice

That you wished freedom and independence finds appealing

Amidst calls for assimilation the prominent sees it good than fraud

That as if for the sake of peace and plenty

If not tired for blood and fire from places so many

All was but tragic at Kabanatuan

To see blood stained bolos

If not heated barrels in their revolvers and mausers 

Coming from the disgtuntled men in rayadillos and khakis

All loyal to a once-Kapitan del Barrio Synonymous with power

The affluent yet traitorous has rejoiced over your death

Hidden in their silence as your coffin marches on its way

While the patriotic yet silent sees the coming dismay:

"He is dead, the revolution is dead" as what it say

And days passed lies all but defeat

Minor victories not enough for days tragic as people weep

Of seeing houses burned and everyone to concentration camps

If not brutally raped or murdered in the name of the flag

Of a country once synonymous with freedom

The empire of liberty has devoured its children

That until today justice clamoured from its victims

While the traitors embraced a sugar coated fraud 

Enough to keep their interests firm with different names and moves

Strange those times for a nation trying to live

As the "benevolent" foe from the west marches in its way

Passing from trenches and mountains

Underestimating the struggle as barbaric brigands

To be educated by schoolbooks and krags

Of what were the three hundred thirty three years of bondage

The Hispanists called as a legacy of civilisation and ripe for independence

To be disregarded by the star sprangled gringos 

Whose slander is called benevolent exploitation?

Well, since war was his mistress from Manila to Kalookan, 

Lady death was his bride as he swore fighting till end in Kabantuan

As he told to the world must jump into the dark abyss 

Disregarding life for freedom amidst crisis

Willing to stay in hell tormenting foes such gore

So as for his country to live in paradise 

All is but silent in Kabanatuan

Waiting for an unlikely fate such as a bloodied flag 

Soiled by its foe's boots until night. 

And I am praying that freedom comes

Over apathies, anything unenlight

For my prayers were also once his

And others who died in the endless fight

They all married to death

If not war as its mistress

As they jumped into the dark abyss

For they knew their fates has been set

Just to bring freedom for a long suffering nation's bliss

An upsurge of "patriotism?"

An upsurge of "Patriotism?"

Notes after people taking interest in history

After watching Jerold Tarog's "Heneral Luna"

By Lualhati Madlangawa Guererro 

It's been days passed as Jerold Tarog's Heneral Luna has been shown in cinemas around the country, and in it lies hundreds, if not thousands of individuals becoming "patriots" if not "nationalists" overnight after seeing a movie about a hero whose love for country costs his life, worse, from a fellow Filipino or rather say, from a fellow Ilustrado.

At first, it deemed strange as this person knows that in the middle of continuous Yankee-isation of the Filipino mind, of favouring selling one's patrimony to vested interests, it seems that the movie has almost changed everyone's minds, if not swaying away from the typical chick flicks commonly shown both in movies and in TV. That through comments on social media sites, isn't it that amazing for a patriot to see an upsurge of patriotism over those of consumeristic fantasies that is commonly peddled in Television and in the Internet? How amazing.

However as the trend continues, this person also thinks that despite these "upsurge" does it also mean these people watching and commenting in social media sites "serious" in being patriotic citing Jerold Tarog's movie as its reference? Or simply just joining the bandwagon all after watching Rayadillo-clad men raising the battle standard if not well-known artists venting the human side of textbook demigods? Are they willing to lessen their usual Yankee-ness, Pseudo-Korean fantasies and the like, and instead harnessing their acquired skill and knowledge for the betterment of their Compatriots? Well, this person, like the others concerned, knows that certain Filipinos are actually Filipinos out of convenience if not easy to give up their own country all for "greener pastures" as they equate their homeland with those of poverty and despair. A few of those who left for developed countries maybe trying to resuscitate their patriotic fervor as they recall their origins, as others unjustly threw their origins altogether and simply "move on" as if everything as irrelevant in favour of a new life abroad.

But on the other hand, certain Filipinos at home has forgotten its own history especially those of its revolutionary heritage; maybe because with fads such as those of a distorted interpretation of "moving on", studying history has nothing to do with themselves, irrelevant besides part of one's schooling like any other subject like Mathematics and English. Yet with the "Heneral Luna" fad, these same people eventually put questions if not laughing every scene, particularly those of Epy Quizon's role as Apolinario Mabini doing nothing except sitting down and telling Aguinaldo (played by Mon Confiado) if he can able to "catch the wind" or drinking brandy with Felipe Buencamino and Pedro Paterno. 

Sorry to say this, but are these people ridiculing (rather than questioning the person or the scene) didn't know that Apolinario Mabini was the well-known "Sublime Paralytic" working hard for his country despite afflicted by Polio? Perhaps these people whom are just disregarding history for chrissakes reminds of those who listen to rumours about Mabini striken with Syphilis (according to his enemies) and mistaken for a whole truth! Quite worrying to some including yours truly, to think how existing educational policies if not the intentional apathy of most people resulted to such questions people may deem it as unworthy of a question and instead criticisisable because of its statement.

Well, despite all these problems be it those of shallowness and really existing apathies, it is the duty of Filipinos to educate people in spirit of rekindling heritage and reencountering one's identity as a Filipino. True that it is easier to malign them for being stupid rather than ignorant after seeing such ridiculous "questions", of disregarding their heritage in favour of today's shallowness commonly featured in Television and in Social Media. But also come to think that this person finds it amazing, especially in watching every scene enough to make everyone applause, of "becoming historians overnight" after watching that movie with all its cast, storyline, as well as cinematography, compared to the past ones that were as if these viewers were compelled by their teachers to watch: like Romnick Sarmenta's "Tirad Pass", Robin Padilla's "Alab ng Lahi", or even Jorge Estregan's "El Presidente" that made everyone even question Aguinaldo as a leader, a revolutionary, or even as a person driven by power. 

Sadly, "Heneral Luna" is not even encouraged by the Education Department compared to those earlier movies stated, while the Board of Censors rather gave the movie rated "R-13" that limits viewers to 13 years of age and above, that somehow one would ask "of what is enlightening the children then if the Education Department did not encourage watching Jerold Tarog's work?" In fact, that movie, despite its political incorrectness featured (foul language et al.) as well as graphically bloody scenes, is ideally for all audiences given its call for rekindling patriotic consciousness! 

A scene inspired from Juan Luna's Spoliarium
(Via Facebook)

Anyways, admittingly speaking, it would take years for everyone to be educated, and be inspired by the lessons of the past in order to rekindle their almost forgotten Filipinoness. If not mistaken, Imelda Marcos was right to say that culture has to be cultivated in pursuit of making the "New Filipino" regardless of its mediums knowing that in their respective work lies the intention of instilling a cherished value, the so-called force that makes a nation great and lasting as what today's "Heneral Luna" tends to invoke. 

Hope that the quest for reviving one's patriotism via today's "upsurge" of having most taking history for an interesting topic is more than just a trend, for the really concerned knows that anything has been treated like any other fad, and after these series of patriotic fervor that has been tempered with words be it those of "love" and "forever" these past few months, everyone will return to their frustrated illusions such as what commonly shown on their idiot screens. 

That's all for now. ¡Adelante Compatriotas!

The desire for a "true new society"

The desire for a "true new society"

Sweet roses of the revolution

Your fragrance is in the land

You smell blood and ashes

You bloomed out of tears

You inspired Bonifacio's unfinished song

Now the youth hums to finish it

Youths have fallen in the night

'Cause your petals thirst for their blood in the morning

The rich are laughing in their penthouses

The poor are dying in their huts

The cold night bubbles with pop songs

The poor baby's cry is filtered in the air

The innocent cries behind prison bars

While the rich desecrate the laws of the land

The politicians bark: reformation

The youth cries: Revolution!

- Fedrico Pastibe Pobre

The fundamental historical change that has been idealised and promised through the ages has been likely deemed rhetorical if not a series of half-hearted, or even half-baked series of reforms and programs, much more likely a politics of personality than what they called as politics of principle. 

Since the colonial era to present day, from the Barangays to the present governmental structure, from the Cabezas de Barangay and Gobernadorcillos to the town mayors and presidents of the "republic", same old personalistic orientations continue to thrive, although trying to temper with those of principle. However, the difference lies in its sense, its view: for the former tends to be collectivistic in character, yet eventually becoming individualistic as the established order tries to disintegrate collective power as it deemphasise in favour of unbridled individualism with emphasis on "just personal initiative". Good to hear about the emphasis, but it has becoming am alibi for the system to disregard its duties especially in dispensing justice, amidst promises catering to the common man. The system was democratic in form according to its fundamental laws and other related decrees, yet autocratic in its essence with all its interests emphasised.

And though wielded by a majority according to what people think of from elections to those of "people power", its political power remains wielded in the hands of the few, hence, likely to have popular aspirations be half-hearted especially those of a moral imperative to transform society in order to eradicate poverty, redistribute wealth, and genuinely achieve social justice. Worse, these few shrugging off the fundamental problem in favour of a just character revisiting with phrases like "man is the problem not the society", that personal ignorance is the issue and not the actually existing socioeconomic crisis that brought people into poverty such as those from Negros region decades ago with Landlords like Hortensia Starke asserting such belief in pursuit of opposing Agrarian Reform and its related provisions.

But regardless of what the few insisted as just, what everybody sees is that these few aggravates an age old problem hidden beneath state of the art entirety the society has offered. Age old in a sense that everybody saw farms depending on centuries-old agriculture and fisheries, worse, threatened by corporate farming and fishing thanks to landlords having titles, stocks, even positions in both civil and corporate affairs. And in that case for an example, justice has been diluted, negated, overturned in favour of interests with apologists asserting their so-called inherent rights that includes undermining the common good. Such assertions provoked protests that led to bloodshed in case of Escalante, Mendiola, Lupao, amd Hacienda Luisita wherein Land and Justice as its call, of what those aspirations if power remains under those of the "privileged" few as it was in the past?  

Sometimes, it seems that the late Ninoy Aquino, via his Asiaweek article, was right to say that the Philippines is a frustrated individualistic society while its neighbours really cling to its communitarian traditions, or as what he says, command societies  with roots on filial piety and strong leaders. The Philippines is supposed to be communitarian one given from its pre-Hispanic past and centuries-old traditions from the provinces. And in it, leaders like Marcos and his successors did tried to create a semblance of communitarian spirit, that the country of his was as similar to Franco's "Una, Grande, y Libre" with Marcos's own "One nation, One spirit"; that Ramos tried with his "Moral Recovery" and Noynoy Aquino with his "Righteous Path", but despite all the slogans, rhetoric, and state-spomsored frustrations, the prevailing colonial mindset that has tolerated for decades and the intentional miseducation by the system itself has really cultivated in the minds of the majority that somehow reduced that communitarian spirit to those shown to tourists while favouring a frustrated individualistic one benefiting the rich. Therefore, of what are those frustrations to bring back time old descriptions of the Filipino society if at the same time cultivating those of the repressive west? 

From a poster made by Cornelis Koekkoek

Well, what people simply wanted is a governance, as well as a society that really fosters, cultivates a collective political culture: a communitarian oriented rather than populist, social rather than individualist, and national instead of depending on the dictates of other countries and its domestic stooges. It may deem idealistic due to its description and it requires seeking truth from facts and remolding for a true character, but to think that having a corrupt society really made its victims demanding such profound aspirations to have a free, social, then why not? Even the bureaucrats concerned desired and provide important remarks that no democracy can be authentic if it is the captive of the system, particularly of the oligarchs and international finance capital, whose interests are at cross purposes with those of the majority. That democracy has to deal with the aspirations of the people, therefore must evolve, develop, and refine into suitable to its clamour, of today's "national purpose."

After all, in a developing country, the state, via its "actually existing responsible" government, should be really acting, managing the historical process alongside the people. The revolution what people demanded is not just peace, land, and bread alone, but also to mitigate, if not eliminate poverty, social injustice, ignorance, and other socio-economic problems and at the same time the need to transform underdeveloped or developing communities into self sufficient, adequate communities whose material and spiritual wealth are woven to create a healthy living whole. That ideal future simply demands popular participation, especially when it comes to decisions that affects the lives of millions, of those who desire for land reform and full employment, of agricultural self sufficiency and self reliance in industry, of safeguarding national freedom and adhere to social justice. Of what is Lenin's decree on land, of Castro's agrarian reform if it is not approved by the people? Of what were the efforts of industrialising Korea and China if not the goal of asserting independence? 

Those who trying to protect their interest tends to oppose it, worse, they have no alternatives to offer besides preserving the backward order of things in the guise of "individual initiative" and nothing else.

From the Philippine Collegian

That somehow intensifies the situation, no wonder the social volcano continues to have its magma boil,  that the revolt of the poor remains unfinished. 

Smoke over the south: Notes after incidents against struggling Lumads and its clamour for Justice

Smoke over the south:

Notes after incidents against struggling Lumads 

and its clamour for Justice 

The smoke of battle remains uncleared in the southern front. Despite the recent statements from local government units, national police, armed forces, and even the common men in social media sites, there remains to be seen long range solutions to a problem which has not only rocked the region for decades but negates present and even future agreements between the government and the affected people, if not the insurgents who had also fighting against exploitation and injustice.

The Problems must be solved side by side by those concerning within the national government  as well as organisations seriously committed to the welfare of the people; but first is the dismantlement of paramitlitary groups whose intention is to pread havoc in the name of national security given its support from the government: such as Bagani, Magahat, Alamara, Alimaong Tribal Justice, and various groups making victims out of those against exploitaiton of natural resources and infringing indigenous peoples rights. And second, the ultimate problem is to settle the land reform issue, as well as the genuine right of self determination for indigenous peoples particularly those of Lumad tribespeople.

For the fact that recent events such as those of ALCADEV incident, and the displacement of Lumads somehow showed the fear coming from paramilitary groups, instead of the rebels whom according to the Lumads dispensed justice and respect. These paramilitary groups, such as his writeup stated above, is supported by government as well as private interests whose intention is to take over communal properties for "development", be it those of mining, cash crop plantation, tourism, and others exploitative in nature. 

If saturating the troubled areas alone is the answer taken by the government and its apologetics in social media sites, then the issue is far from being solved, what more of unjustly describing the killed as enemies of the state, of certain institutions as coddling subversives, and the entire indigenious tribespeople as rebels and liable for death. For one thing the presence of armed forces, be it the government and paramilitary groups, only intensified the ire of the belligerent peoples for the latter believe that these armed men are there on behalf of mining interests. It even making the issue worse because one legislator justifies the said paramilitary groups as indigenous defence systems using the "Indigenous Peoples Rights Act" citing "Self Determination" as its clause, while apologetics in social media sites blaming the New Peoples Army or any other groups for hindering "developments" in affected districts, if not urging tribespeople to fight against the moves of the government and its supporting interests.

A factfinding operation has been undergoing according to recent reports amidst criticism from certain groups aligned with interests, and it is somehow a good step in resolving the issue particularly those of the incident. Calls for dismantling paramilitary groups as necessary in favour of visiting peace organisations in assuring the return of evacuees to their jomes and in wiping off the mounting jitters of terrorised natives. 

Quite ideal though but not enough, for everyone knew that the Lumad problem is more than just discimination alone. The land in which part of Lumad heritage and identity has been exploited by interests given the abundance of minerals needed for export, if not fields for cash crops be it cassava, palm, or bananas; Lumad identity has been exploited for tourism and various exploitative acts that disrespects the culture and herirage of the mountainfolk; that amidst existing acts like IPRA, it failed to heed the demands of the mountainfolk be it those of respect, equity, and justice. Several weeks ago everyone read the statement from Nancy Catamco telling that "traditional defence systems" of the indigenous communities, or rather say paramilitary groups funded by the government and vested interests, also deserve to be recognised in a way that "it would fit their own customs, traditions, and practises." 

Such justifications coming from a legislator as well as its apologetics may likely to interpret as an attempt to "put a clean image" to those whom instigate murders and threats against the mountainfolk, hence having that smoke of battle remains uncleared. 

The murderers continue to roam their so-called "territory" trying to deny their murderous actions such as after the ALCADEV incident, while the displaced continue to face problems in their evacuation sites yet can't even afford to return as long as paramilitary murderers, if not the armed forces continue to occupy their homes or worse, looting for their booty; But perhaps with the factfinding missions as well as support coming from concerned organisations and individuals served as its basis for putting light and justice on the side of Lumads and its sympathisers, hope that their calls be realised, in a way letting the air of a just peace sweep the smoke of what the system almost described as a tribal conflict if not terrorism.

A Continuing Past, a prevailing issue, and a Commitment to Struggle

A Continuing Past,
a prevailing issue,
and a Commitment to Struggle

Notes after September 21, its excesses and excuses

 and its legacy of a continuing revolt from the poor

"Government, Protesters, and Big Capital: The stand off"
by Jose Tence Cruz
Graphite, Tempra, Pen and Ink on Strathmore watercolour paper
Published in Who Magazine, 1983

"We need to make the oligarchy and Philippine big business more accountable. They can be just as oppressive and exploitative as any tyrant."

These are the words saidth by Carlos Celdran in his post, and it somehow reflects this person's view of having a rotten order such as this present.

The oligarchs, or specifically corrupt bureaucrats churning off large public accounts, as well as big landlords controlling both large estates and investing with its large stocks, has dominated the society for decades since the birth of this so-called "republic". That behind its democratic veneer is almost a totalitarian one that has two sides be it populistic or elitist, but given its repressive nature it has less to do with the people, regardless of the infrastructure, the rising economic rate, anything worth appealing to the people, sneerable both through eye and ear and conclude how successful, progressive that "New Society", or its any similar term be it "Philippines 2000" or "Strong Republic", no matter how corrupted its majority of bureaucrats and other people on high involved.

"Martial Law" by Anna Fer
limited edition print, 1984
from the Bantayog ng mga Bayani Collection.

But at first, this writeup is all but a rambling, not just remembering those days of hatred, all after the failed "New Society" and its subsequent governments till present. And to think that Martial Law, or as what loyalists afforded to call as the "New Society" has leaned on both "Nationalist" and "Neoliberalist" inclinations, with the former in its attempt to keep firm the status quo while the latter in its mean to resolve the economic question amidst nationalist trappings. Quite contraditicting though knowing that Marcos and his successors has played both as "nationalists" while most of its policies made themselves puppets of a bigger entity. Apologetics may afforded to say that the country as in need of an ally in case of conflicts with neighbouring countries, yet, come to think of this: true that the Philippines needs allies, but how about rolling its own sleeves and forge for a greater future as what their statements said so? Remember, its neighbours were once weak, but they afforded to stand on its own; Singapore, the country in which certain individuals and groups lean upon as an example of discipline afforded to stand on its own regardless of having lack of resources and relying on outside investments, yet having a state that somehow described as "incorruptible" does economic internvention on behalf of their folk. How about the Philippines? Nope, but instead it has been obeying dictates from international moneylenders and its domestic advisers.
True that there are infrastructures made during those periods, fueled by the desire to create a facade of progress, it was, or even is, obvious to see a showcase of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, or even airports; while at the same time cultivating arts, culture, of trying to create a "New Filipino" capable of heeding the demands of both present and the future whilst rooted on the aspirations of its own past, be it Rizal, Bonifacio, Mabini, and various heroes yearning for national and social liberation. But remember that Marcos's era, as well as its successors was also those of Thatcher and Reagan, of "Reaganomics" and "Peace through Strength" that resulted to people angry due to increasing prices if not militarisation; that behind the rhetorics of peace and stability as stated by its apologetics was those of injustice as the status quo tries to keep firm amidst growing opposition, with all its tortures, imprisonment of certain personages, or even enforced disappearances and displacement of communities particularly those from the countryside. After 1986 comes its excesses in the name of restoring order hidden beneath the veneer of "Freedom" and "Democracy" as observed by many during those times.

Painting inspired by Juan Luna's "Spoliarium"

Admittingly speaking, people may have appreciate the infrastructure made by those times, be it the bridges, schools, roads, hospitals, anything be described as a Marcosian legacy if not a credit grabbing feat that somehow made most, if not all, criticise than appreciate for having names be inscribed till making themselves synonymous to those infrastructure left. 

But on the other hand, as what apologists love to tell based on their "experiences", that it is also true and necessary to say that in a matter of survival as a community, a revival of national consciousness has to be enacted, that the youth has to cultivate national awareness in pursuit of reclaiming again National Identity and a truly profound sense of national pride different from what is usually shown in mass media.
But sadly, that reclaiming is all but aesthetic as compared to its neighbouring countries that really instill national consciousness that is, beyond music and art; ironically, that revival made some who consistently oppose even made their creativities and opposition even stronger.

And to paraphrase the statement of late Teodoro Locsin, it is true that Mentally dishonest Filipinos, particularly those of the system and its apologetics such as in social media, frequently pay lip service to human liberty, to democracy, to progress and stability; and based on what everyone observe it has even invoke further freedom of speech and the press enough to sneer people through the eye and in the ear; but inconviently speaking, it is true enough that their heart is with the totalitarian system, given their "tradition" of keeping the status quo of interest, including those of sacrificing both man and it's community's right to live and enjoy. They do not love liberty, democracy, not even progress and stability, they only make use of it, most likely a rhetoric perhaps. And if when they are in power, as what it is today and in the past, they will erase the infamy, particularly coming from those who stand in their way, be it the shantytown dweller from Tondo, the farmer from Hacienda Luisita, the worker from South Superhighway, the indigenous tribe from Bukidnon, the student from the University of the East, or even a professional who at times spent the frivolities of life at Tomas Morato after a work at Technohub in Diliman.

And no wonder why there are still protests and writeups concerning about a country's true state behind what is commonly presented. 

That's all for now.