Beyond Rhetoric: A Need for a Real Path to American Greatness
Wednesday 6 November 2024
Beyond Rhetoric: A Need for a Real Path to American Greatness
Thursday 31 October 2024
"A night of defiance"
A Lament for the Fallen: Remembering the Victims of Injustice
A Lament for the Fallen: Remembering the Victims of Injustice
As the community observes All Hallows’ Eve and subsequently All Sainrs and All Souls, altogether occasions traditionally dedicated to remembering the deceased, it presents a critical opportunity for deep reflection on the ongoing issues of violence, corruption, and systemic injustice within society. This somber evening urges us to acknowledge the countless victims of extrajudicial killings, involuntary disappearances, and a culture that often glorifies the corrupt while neglecting the vulnerable.
The Philippines has been the subject of widespread condemnation due to its government’s aggressive anti-drug campaign, often termed the “war on drugs.” Reports from reputable organizations such as Human Rights Watch reveal a staggering statistic: over 30,000 individuals have died since the campaign began in 2016. Many of these victims are innocent civilians, marginalized individuals wrongfully accused of drug offenses, and members of the most vulnerable communities. This violence not only takes lives but also inflicts lasting trauma on families and communities left to grapple with their loss.
The lament of the prophet Jeremiah resonates deeply with those affected: “My people are crushed, they are broken down; they are filled with confusion” (Jeremiah 8:21). This scriptural passage captures the anguish experienced by families mourning their lost loved ones and reflects a broader societal malaise marked by fear, confusion, and despair. It invites us to consider the impact of these violent acts on the collective psyche of the nation. When individuals live in a climate of fear, trust erodes, and community bonds weaken, further isolating victims’ families who often lack the support necessary to navigate their grief.
The recent surge in involuntary disappearances exacerbates this crisis, highlighting the human rights abuses endemic in the current political climate. A report by the Philippine Daily Inquirer sheds light on the experiences of families enduring the agonizing uncertainty of having loved ones go missing. These stories illustrate not only the personal anguish of individuals left searching for answers but also the broader implications for human rights in the Philippines. The lack of accountability and transparency surrounding these disappearances reflects a systemic failure to protect the most vulnerable members of society, emphasizing the urgent need for societal reform and justice.
The glorification of corrupt practices within the political sphere further complicates this landscape of violence. Investigative reports from outlets such as the New York Times reveal a troubling trend: certain leaders are praised for their authoritarian governance styles, even as evidence mounts of their complicity in human rights violations. This admiration for figures who employ violence and coercion raises critical questions about societal values. How have we, as a community, allowed ourselves to be conditioned to accept, or even celebrate, leadership that prioritizes power over justice? This troubling phenomenon demands introspection and a reevaluation of cultural narratives that have emerged in response to political corruption.
Scripture provides a moral framework for confronting these issues. The Gospel of Matthew 5:4 states, “Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.” This call to mourn collectively serves as an essential reminder that the grief experienced by individuals resonates throughout the entire community. The faithful are urged to stand in solidarity with those suffering from the effects of violence, recognizing that true comfort arises not from indifference but from shared compassion and action.
The interconnectedness of social justice and environmental issues further complicates the plight of marginalized communities in the Philippines. Recent reports from the Manila Bulletin highlight how climate change exacerbates vulnerabilities, particularly for coastal communities facing rising sea levels and extreme weather events. The displacement caused by environmental degradation disproportionately impacts the poor, who often lack the resources necessary to adapt or recover. These intersecting crises compel a reevaluation of justice that encompasses not only human rights but also environmental stewardship, urging society to address the root causes of inequality and exploitation.
Psalm 82:3-4 states, “Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.” This biblical mandate calls the faithful to action, urging them to advocate for justice and serve as defenders for those who are often marginalized and voiceless. As individuals of faith, there exists a moral obligation to respond to these injustices actively, seeking to uplift those who suffer under the weight of oppression and violence.
While the challenges are daunting, stories of resilience and hope emerge from within communities striving for justice. Numerous grassroots organizations and individuals work tirelessly to support victims’ families, advocating for accountability and reform in the face of systemic injustice. They embody the spirit of Micah 6:8, which exhorts believers to “act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with [their] God.” These efforts exemplify a commitment to creating a more just and compassionate society, demonstrating that even in the face of overwhelming adversity, hope and action can prevail.
As the community gathers in remembrance, it is vital to honor the lives lost to violence and injustice. A moment of silence serves as a powerful gesture of respect, allowing individuals to collectively acknowledge their grief. Lighting candles in memory of the fallen symbolizes the community’s commitment to keeping their memories alive and reminds everyone that the pursuit of justice is a shared responsibility. Each flickering flame represents a life taken too soon, illuminating the path toward a more just future.
In conclusion, the faithful are called to engage actively in the pursuit of justice and compassion in their daily lives. They are urged to challenge the forces of corruption and violence, inspired by the belief that “the Lord upholds all who fall and lifts up all who are bowed down” (Psalm 145:14). Every life lost due to violence and injustice is a poignant reminder of the necessity for systemic change and societal introspection. By remembering the fallen and advocating for the voiceless, the community can work toward a future where love, justice, and righteousness prevail over corruption and cruelty.
In this Hallowide, through this eve, serves not merely as a day of remembrance but as a call to action—a clarion call to fight against the tide of violence and oppression and to cultivate a society in which justice and compassion reign supreme. It is an invitation to every individual to consider their role in this ongoing struggle for human dignity and rights, ensuring that the memory of the fallen inspires a renewed commitment to justice for all.
Wednesday 30 October 2024
Celebrating and Reaffirming Struggle: A sociocultural exploration of Samhain (Halloween) as Invoking Spirit of Resistance in Irish Republicanism
A Prelude to Undas: Reinterpreting Halloween in the Filipino Context
A Prelude to Undas: Reinterpreting Halloween in the Filipino Context
But, as the tradition evolved, it blended with Christian influences, particularly All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ Day, becoming a celebration associated with costumes, festivities, and, later, commercialism (Agoncillo, 1990; Reyes, 2015).
• Reyes, C. (2015). “Undas: A Time to Remember.” Philippine Daily Inquirer.
Monday 28 October 2024
Sociological Dutertism: Understanding the still-lingering Cultural Dynamics from the past Duterte Administration in the Philippines
The recent Senate and House investigations into the previous administration's "war on drugs" have reignited concerns about accountability for its actions. Critics are particularly troubled by former President Duterte's unapologetic admission of maintaining a "death squad" to target specific groups, raising serious ethical and legal questions about his approach to justice, his interpretation of the rule of law, and his apparent disdain for human rights.
Duterte stated, “My mandate as president of the republic was to protect the country and the Filipino people. Do not question my policies, because I offer no apologies, no excuses. I did what I had to do, and whether you believe it or not, I did it for my country.” His defiance was evident as he walked into the hearing with a cane, often resorting to curses while addressing senators.
Supporters of Duterte are likely to cling to his message, interpreting it as a defense of his actions and framing his brutal methods as necessary for restoring order and the rule of law. They often downplay the grim reality of the estimated 12,000 to 30,000 killings between 2016 and 2019, suggesting that the victims were simply drug users or dealers, or even “collateral damage” in the pursuit of a quieter society.
Thus in this situation highlights a sociological phenomenon known as Dutertism, where staunch supporters rally around promises of a tough stance on crime and the need for peace and order, all while aligning with Duterte's ruralism and his vision of governance. To use José Luis López Aranguren, this phenomenon has turned policies, even a legacy into a 'way of life' for the people.
Introducing "Sociological Dutertism"
The concept of "sociological Dutertism" captures the intricate dynamics of public sentiment and social behavior influenced by former President Rodrigo Duterte's governance. His administration's policies, particularly the controversial war on drugs, have sparked widespread debate and reflection on the implications of authoritarianism, violence, and populism in Philippine society.
This article examines key elements of sociological Dutertism, including the possibility of "Tokhang denialism", the redirection of public focus to purported "positive" attributes of Duterte's governance, and a yearning for dictatorial leadership, while analyzing their broader sociocultural implications. Additionally, it explores the role of fake news as a coping mechanism for supporters navigating the complexities of Duterte’s presidency.
Tokhang Denialism
Cognitive Dissonance and Rationalization
The war on drugs, particularly Oplan Tokhang, has been marked by significant human rights violations, including extrajudicial killings. Supporters often engage in denialism to resolve the cognitive dissonance created by the contrast between their desire for safety and the violent means employed to achieve it. By minimizing or outright denying the existence of extrajudicial killings, they can uphold their belief that the campaign is fundamentally about protecting society from drug-related crime (Human Rights Watch, 2019).
This denialism is further reinforced by the framing strategies employed by the Duterte administration. Officials emphasize successes in crime reduction, showcasing statistics that reflect decreased drug-related incidents while sidelining reports of violence. As noted by Amnesty International, this selective emphasis enables supporters to maintain a narrative that rationalizes the brutality of the campaign (Amnesty International, 2017).
Sociocultural Implications of Denialism
The sociocultural implications of Tokhang denialism are profound. By fostering an environment where violence is normalized, denialism contributes to a culture of impunity, eroding trust in law enforcement and the judicial system. This erosion can have cascading effects, leading to decreased civic engagement and a general acceptance of authoritarian measures as legitimate responses to crime (Bacani, 2019).
Shifting Attention to "Positive" Attributes
Economic Narratives and Infrastructure Development
Supporters of Duterte frequently highlight initiatives like "Build, Build, Build," a massive infrastructure program aimed at stimulating economic growth. This focus serves not only as a distraction from the administration's violent policies but also as a means to create a narrative of progress and development. The framing of Duterte as a transformative leader resonates with many who view economic stability as a priority, often overshadowing discussions about human rights (Balisacan, 2020).
This strategic shifting of attention underscores a broader sociological phenomenon where citizens prioritize perceived economic benefits over civil liberties. As political analyst Richard Javad Heydarian points out, "Duterte’s ability to deliver infrastructure projects has allowed him to maintain a loyal base, despite mounting controversies" (Heydarian, 2020). This loyalty stems from a belief that tangible improvements in infrastructure can translate into enhanced quality of life, further justifying the administration's contentious actions.
Populism and Political Legitimacy
The populist rhetoric utilized by Duterte and his supporters plays a critical role in this attention shift. By framing the administration as a champion of the common Filipino, Duterte creates a narrative that positions his leadership as a necessary response to elite corruption and inefficiency. This rhetoric fosters a sense of belonging among supporters, who may perceive themselves as part of a broader movement for change. As sociologist Nicole Curato observes, this populist narrative often leads to the vilification of dissenters as enemies of progress, complicating discussions surrounding human rights and governance (Curato, 2017).
Yearning for Dictatorship
Historical Context and Authoritarian Nostalgia
A yearning for a dictatorial governance style is a prominent feature of sociological Dutertism. This sentiment can be traced to historical experiences of authoritarianism in the Philippines, where certain segments of the population associate strongman leadership with stability and order. For many, the perceived chaos of democratic governance fosters nostalgia for the more straightforward, albeit repressive, measures employed during the Marcos regime (Sison, 2018).
This nostalgia is often reinforced by a contemporary narrative that frames the return of authoritarian rule as a necessary evil in the face of rising crime rates and social unrest. Many citizens, particularly those who feel marginalized or threatened by criminality, may support authoritarian measures as a means to restore peace and order. This belief is frequently articulated in the context of security, where a strong leader is viewed as essential to effectively combat crime and restore public safety.
Collective Identity and Mobilization
The yearning for dictatorship is also accompanied by a strong sense of collective identity among Duterte’s supporters. Many feel empowered by their association with a leader who positions himself as a savior, creating a community that actively defends his administration's policies. This mobilization fosters a sociocultural identity that values strength and decisiveness over democratic norms. As political scientist David K. E. O. Lim argues, "The collective support for Duterte reflects a deeper societal longing for a decisive figure who can navigate the complexities of contemporary Philippine society" (Lim, 2019).
The Role of Fake News in Sociological Dutertism
The Acceptability of Fake News
For Duterte's supporters, the legitimacy of information often hinges on its alignment with their beliefs rather than its factual accuracy. Fake news that targets opposition figures or critics is frequently accepted without question, as it resonates with their worldview. This selective acceptance highlights a broader sociocultural phenomenon where emotional truths—feelings of safety, stability, and national pride—take precedence over objective reality. As Heydarian notes, "Supporters often create a narrative that absolves the administration of wrongdoing, viewing critical perspectives as attacks on their identity" (Heydarian, 2020).
Coping Mechanism and the Search for Positive Reception
The reliance on fake news serves as a coping mechanism for supporters navigating the complexities and controversies surrounding Duterte’s governance. By focusing on narratives that present the administration in a favorable light, they can shield themselves from the cognitive dissonance generated by conflicting information. This mechanism allows supporters to construct an idealized version of reality that emphasizes Duterte's accomplishments while downplaying human rights abuses and extrajudicial killings.
The preference for "positive receptions" is fueled by a collective desire for validation. In a society rife with polarization, supporters find comfort in narratives that affirm their beliefs and dismiss dissenting voices as elitist or out of touch. This dynamic creates an echo chamber where misinformation thrives, reinforcing a sense of community among supporters who view themselves as defenders of a "common man" against perceived elite corruption.
Downplaying Controversies Through Relatable Rhetoric
Supporters often downplay the administration’s controversial actions by framing them as typical responses from a "common man" or a provincial perspective. This narrative strategy humanizes Duterte, allowing supporters to relate to him as an ordinary citizen confronting the challenges faced by everyday Filipinos. Such relatability transforms contentious statements and actions into expressions of frustration rather than indicators of authoritarianism.
As Curato notes, "The rhetoric surrounding Duterte's actions often appeals to the shared experiences of many Filipinos, framing harsh measures as necessary for survival in a chaotic environment" (Curato, 2017). This framing provides a rationale for supporters, who may view aggressive policies as justified in the fight against crime and disorder.
Implications for Public Discourse and Democratic Norms
The acceptance of fake news as alternative facts among Duterte’s supporters poses significant challenges for public discourse and democratic norms in the Philippines. As misinformation becomes a pervasive tool for justifying controversial policies, the line between truth and falsehood blurs, complicating efforts to foster informed debate and accountability.
Moreover, this reliance on fake news contributes to a culture of distrust towards traditional media and institutions. Supporters may dismiss critical reporting as biased or part of a broader conspiracy against the administration, reinforcing their allegiance to Duterte and further entrenching societal divisions.
Implications of Sociological Dutertism
Human Rights Abuses and the Culture of Impunity
The implications of sociological Dutertism extend beyond immediate governance issues, with profound impacts on human rights and the rule of law. The normalization of violence and the acceptance of extrajudicial killings can create a culture of impunity where human rights abuses become systemic. The consequences are far-reaching, affecting not only the individuals targeted but also the broader societal trust in democratic institutions (Bacani, 2019).
As noted by the United Nations, the ongoing violations linked to the war on drugs contribute to a broader erosion of democratic principles, with potential long-term ramifications for governance in the Philippines (United Nations, 2019). The atmosphere of fear that arises from these dynamics can further stifle dissent, discourage civic engagement, and undermine efforts to promote accountability and justice.
Political Polarization and the Erosion of Democratic Discourse
Sociological Dutertism has also intensified political polarization in the Philippines. The fervent loyalty exhibited by Duterte's supporters often leads to the marginalization of dissenting voices, complicating efforts for constructive dialogue. As Curato emphasizes, "The polarized environment creates barriers to constructive public discourse, making it difficult to address the multifaceted challenges facing the nation" (Curato, 2017).
This polarization can entrench divisions within society, creating a chasm between supporters and detractors of the administration. In such an environment, calls for accountability and reform may be perceived as attacks on the administration, further exacerbating tensions.
Shaping Future Governance and Societal Norms
The legacy of sociological Dutertism poses challenges for future governance in the Philippines. If the normalization of violence continues, subsequent administrations may feel pressured to adopt similar hardline approaches to maintain public support. This could perpetuate a cycle of repression rather than fostering constructive solutions to complex social problems.
Moreover, the sociocultural dynamics associated with Duterte's presidency may shape societal norms around governance and authority. As citizens become accustomed to authoritarian measures as a legitimate response to crime, the expectations for democratic accountability may diminish, paving the way for future leaders to exploit similar sentiments (Bacani, 2019).
Conclusion
Sociological Dutertism reflects a multifaceted interplay of cognitive dissonance, denialism, populist rhetoric, and authoritarian nostalgia. The acceptance of fake news and alternative facts further complicates this landscape, enabling supporters to construct a reality that prioritizes loyalty and emotional truth over factual accuracy. Understanding this phenomenon is essential for addressing the sociopolitical landscape in the Philippines, particularly regarding human rights, governance, and public discourse. As the country grapples with the consequences of Duterte's policies, fostering an informed and critical dialogue about the true costs of such governance is crucial. Only through this understanding can the Philippines aspire to build a just and equitable society that prioritizes both security and human rights, ensuring a future where the lessons of the past inform the path forward.
References
- Amnesty International. (2017). “If You Are Poor, You Are Killed”: Extrajudicial Executions in the Philippines’ War on Drugs.
- Bacani, A. (2019). “The Costs of Duterte's War on Drugs: An Analysis of Human Rights Violations.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 50(3), 445-460.
- Balisacan, A. (2020). “Duterte’s Economic Legacy: Infrastructure Development Amidst Controversy.” Philippine Journal of Economics, 59(1), 1-25.
- Curato, N. (2017). “Democracy in the Time of Duterte: Political Polarization in the Philippines.” Asian Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 89-102.
- Heydarian, R. J. (2020). “The Duterte Administration: A Political Analysis.” Philippine Political Science Journal, 41(1), 5-22.
- Human Rights Watch. (2019). “They Just Kill”: Ongoing Human Rights Violations in the Philippines’ “War on Drugs.”
- Lim, D. K. E. O. (2019). “The Collective Identity of Duterte Supporters: Navigating Complexity in Contemporary Philippine Society.” Philippine Studies, 67(3), 325-342.
- Sison, J. (2018). “Historical Context of Authoritarianism in the Philippines.” Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 66(3), 361-375.
- United Nations. (2019). “Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Situation of Human Rights in the Philippines.”
Sunday 27 October 2024
Capitol Theater in Peril: The Facadism Debate and the Threat to Escolta’s (and Old Manila's) Cultural Heritage
References
• de Guzman, M. E. L. (2019). Urban Planning in Manila: Balancing Development and Heritage.
• Elefante, C. (2007). “The Greenest Building Is… One That Is Already Built.” Journal of Preservation Technology.
• Glancey, J. (2011). “Bridging Old and New: The Architecture of Compromise.” The Guardian.
• Glendinning, M. (2016). The Conservation of Heritage: A Global View.
• ICOMOS. (2017). International Principles of Heritage Conservation.
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities.
• Lichtenstein, A. (2018). Urban Conservation in London: New Approaches.
• National Trust for Historic Preservation. (2018). The Economic Impact of Heritage Tourism.
• Santos, M. (2020). Heritage and the City: The Changing Landscape of Manila.
• Tan, L. K. (2019). Preservation and Progress: Case Studies in Singapore.