1. Heredity and Social Determinism
Characters like María Clara are victims of circumstances beyond their control. Her illegitimate birth dooms her to a life dictated by societal hypocrisy, making her a tragic embodiment of how rigid colonial hierarchies destroy innocence and agency. Crisostomo Ibarra, despite his education and wealth, cannot escape his identity as a perceived threat to the Spanish regime. His eventual transformation into the vengeful Simoun illustrates how environment and systemic oppression can warp even the most idealistic minds.
2. The Crushing Weight of Oppression
The colonial system in Rizal’s works operates as a vast, impersonal force, reducing individuals to cogs in its machinery. Elias, the noble outcast, and Simoun, the embittered revolutionary, struggle against this system, yet their efforts seem futile. In the naturalist tradition, Rizal shows how human lives are shaped—and often destroyed—by the inexorable weight of social and historical forces.
1. Ibarra and Simoun: An Existential Evolution
Ibarra’s transformation into Simoun reflects an existential journey through hope, despair, and nihilism. In Noli Me Tangere, Ibarra embodies the idealist, believing in reform through reason and education. By the time of El Filibusterismo, this idealism has given way to existential despair as Simoun, whose nihilistic embrace of violence and revenge highlights the corrosive effects of disillusionment. His eventual suicide represents not just the collapse of his revolutionary ideals but also an acknowledgment of life’s inherent absurdity.
2. Elias as the Absurd HeroElias, a character marked by stoic sacrifice, represents the existential hero who confronts absurdity head-on. A man of principle, he fights for justice even when he knows that his efforts may amount to nothing. His self-sacrificial death is an acknowledgment of life’s lack of inherent meaning, yet, like Camus’ absurd hero, Elias finds purpose in the struggle itself.
1. María Clara and the Failure of Redemption
María Clara’s unwavering faith does not shield her from betrayal and suffering. Her retreat into the convent is less a spiritual resolution than a surrender to despair. Rizal critiques how organized religion, rather than offering meaning or solace, often perpetuates the systems of oppression it claims to transcend.
2. Simoun’s Nihilism and Rejection of Faith
Simoun, by contrast, rejects faith entirely, embracing a worldview devoid of moral or spiritual absolutes. His disillusionment mirrors Rizal’s rejection of dogma, yet his nihilism leaves him adrift, consumed by bitterness. His ultimate failure underscores the existential reality that neither blind faith nor total nihilism can provide a satisfying answer to life’s absurdity.
1. The Personal Burden of Genius
Rizal’s brilliance came with a heightened sensitivity to the injustices around him. His exile in Dapitan, far from the intellectual circles of Europe and the revolutionary fervor in Manila, must have felt like a prison for his mind. Like Ibarra and Simoun, Rizal was a man torn between his ideals and the crushing weight of his reality.
2. Martyrdom as Existential Freedom
Rizal’s decision to face execution rather than flee reflects a profound existential courage. By accepting his death, he affirmed his freedom to choose authenticity over survival. In this act, Rizal transcended the deterministic forces of his environment, transforming his personal suffering into a collective symbol of hope and resistance.